Thread View: demon.ip.support.mac
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by PeterO
Mon, 02 Oct 2000 00:00
IE 5 for Mac
Author: PeterO
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 00:00
11 lines
913 bytes
913 bytes
Can anyone please tell me if there are any known issues with IE 5 for the Mac. I have heard various rumours over crashes etc and possible memory leaks but nothing confirmed. Thanks in advance Peter Osbourn Software Engineer Tharstern Ltd
Re: IE 5 for Mac
Author: Peter Ceresole
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 00:00
50 lines
2914 bytes
2914 bytes
In article <970473182.28841.0.nnrp-07.c2de0acf@news.demon.co.uk>, "PeterO" <petero@tharstern.co.uk> wrote: >Can anyone please tell me if there are any known issues with IE 5 for the >Mac. I can only speak from personal experience, on a beige G3/266 running sys 8.1 and an iBook running sys 9.0.4 I run both IE5 and Netscape Navigator 4.08 and need both because: IE5 is nice and quick, and displays HTML pages superbly- better than NN. It works pretty well with Apple's MRJ 2.2, although it (MRJ) needs loads of memory to run. NN's Java is much slower but runs in very little memory and seems much more reliable than the IE5/MRJ combination. However it has an older, more limited implementation of Java. There is a later implementation of MRJ available from the Apple web site and apparently it works better than 2.2. However that isn't the main issue. The real snag is that IE5's Javascript is quite badly broken, although not nearly as badly as IE4.5's, which was a disaster area, and it has trouble with many sites as a result. NN, although older, is immensely better at handling Javascript and will handle many commercial sites that fail with IE5. However, IE5 is superior because of its ability to save site images outside the cache, and the Download Manager is, in my opinion, well worth having. Which is why I use both IE5 and NN. >I have heard various rumours over crashes etc and possible memory leaks but >nothing confirmed. Crashes yes, although most of the time if it crashes you can quit it with a Alt-Cmd-Esc and it will go gracefully. However I wouldn't like to try that too often on system versions before 8.1. Again, NN seems to crash less often. Some crashes are associated with using RealPlayer 7, which compared to previous versions is a bit of a memory hog, so it's hard to generalise. As for memory leaks, I've not seen any evidence of them. I can browse dozens of sites over an hour, and never get any problems except Javascript ones... And those are soft failures- you get an alert, and carry on. These are only my personal opinions, limited to the two machines I use. If you want a wider sample, ask again in uk.comp.sys.mac- I won't cross post there, in case you want to limit your traffic, but if you're interested, give it a try. -- Peter
Re: IE 5 for Mac
Author: PeterO
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 00:00
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 00:00
61 lines
3344 bytes
3344 bytes
This is basically what I thought was the case. Thanks "Peter Ceresole" <peter@cara.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:B5FE7F369668C3E7@cara.demon.co.uk... > In article <970473182.28841.0.nnrp-07.c2de0acf@news.demon.co.uk>, > "PeterO" <petero@tharstern.co.uk> wrote: > > >Can anyone please tell me if there are any known issues with IE 5 for the > >Mac. > > I can only speak from personal experience, on a beige G3/266 running sys > 8.1 and an iBook running sys 9.0.4 > > I run both IE5 and Netscape Navigator 4.08 and need both because: > > IE5 is nice and quick, and displays HTML pages superbly- better than NN. > > It works pretty well with Apple's MRJ 2.2, although it (MRJ) needs loads of > memory to run. NN's Java is much slower but runs in very little memory and > seems much more reliable than the IE5/MRJ combination. However it has an > older, more limited implementation of Java. There is a later implementation > of MRJ available from the Apple web site and apparently it works better > than 2.2. However that isn't the main issue. > > The real snag is that IE5's Javascript is quite badly broken, although not > nearly as badly as IE4.5's, which was a disaster area, and it has trouble > with many sites as a result. NN, although older, is immensely better at > handling Javascript and will handle many commercial sites that fail with > IE5. > > However, IE5 is superior because of its ability to save site images outside > the cache, and the Download Manager is, in my opinion, well worth having. > Which is why I use both IE5 and NN. > > >I have heard various rumours over crashes etc and possible memory leaks but > >nothing confirmed. > > Crashes yes, although most of the time if it crashes you can quit it with a > Alt-Cmd-Esc and it will go gracefully. However I wouldn't like to try that > too often on system versions before 8.1. Again, NN seems to crash less > often. Some crashes are associated with using RealPlayer 7, which compared > to previous versions is a bit of a memory hog, so it's hard to generalise. > > As for memory leaks, I've not seen any evidence of them. I can browse > dozens of sites over an hour, and never get any problems except Javascript > ones... And those are soft failures- you get an alert, and carry on. > > These are only my personal opinions, limited to the two machines I use. If > you want a wider sample, ask again in uk.comp.sys.mac- I won't cross post > there, in case you want to limit your traffic, but if you're interested, > give it a try. > > -- > Peter
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads