🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: demon.ip.support.nt
Article #3615

Re: FAT vs NTFS

#3615
From: Roger J.Hamlett
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 00:00
26 lines
1665 bytes
In article: <GJw4YBA6PUHzEwt$@moofware.demon.co.uk>  Alan J 
Dalziel <alan@moofware.demon.co.uk> writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Recently taken delivery of a shiny new dec pentium 166 with NT4, 
however
> the hard disk is formatted as FAT, is there any speed benefits of
> reformatting as NTFS??  What do you think?
No.
NTFS is slower than FAT, though there is a 'crossover point', as the 
drive gets bigger. However in file-server applications, NTFS can 
perform better than FAT, with the right hardware. Do not go to NTFS 
'looking for speed gains', but move to it if you want a more 'data 
rugged' file-system, and security handleing. However, on a drive 
nearing the top of FAT's handling, I have found NTFS to be _very 
slightly_ faster, but we are talking a tiny percentage.

Best Wishes

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
| EMail roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk  http://www.ttelmah.demon.co.uk/ |
| A beard! A beard! cried Fly Nicholas.'By God, that's a good one!'|
| (Chaucer)                                                        |
Technical Details
Message-ID: <813212567wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <GJw4YBA6PUHzEwt$@moofware.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 112d46,7b7e038684008a54
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d46,public
From: "Roger J.Hamlett" <Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: FAT vs NTFS
Date: 1997/03/05
Message-ID: <813212567wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 223593978
References: <GJw4YBA6PUHzEwt$@moofware.demon.co.uk>
X-Mail2News-User: Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk
X-Mail2News-Path: relay-7.mail.demon.net!relay-5.mail.demon.net!ttelmah.demon.co.uk
Organization: Myorganisation
Reply-To: Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk
Newsgroups: demon.ip.support.nt