🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: demon.ip.support.nt
Article #3616

Re: FAT vs NTFS

#3616
From: Kevin Bennett
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 00:00
23 lines
1315 bytes
On Wed, 5 Mar 1997 09:59:22 +0000, Alan J Dalziel
<alan@moofware.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>Recently taken delivery of a shiny new dec pentium 166 with NT4, however
>the hard disk is formatted as FAT, is there any speed benefits of
>reformatting as NTFS??  What do you think?

Unless you have a quite large drive (>2GB I think - top  of head
figure) then you won't get any speed advantage.  What you do get
though is a much more robust file system.  NTFS uses a rollback system
so that if a disk write fails it can roll the file system back to a
'clean' state using it's log file.

NTFS also allows you to use NT's security features to prevent any
unauthorized or unwanted use of your PC, and also a more economical
use of disk space (512 Byte clusters for a 1 GB drive as opposed to 16
KByte clusters using FAT)


-- 
Kevin Bennett
sorceror@stygia.demon.co.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID: <331ec9ce.770107@news.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <GJw4YBA6PUHzEwt$@moofware.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 112d46,7b7e038684008a54
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d46,public
From: sorceror@stygia.demon.co.uk (Kevin Bennett)
Subject: Re: FAT vs NTFS
Date: 1997/03/05
Message-ID: <331ec9ce.770107@news.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 223696669
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: stygia.demon.co.uk
References: <GJw4YBA6PUHzEwt$@moofware.demon.co.uk>
Organization: None
Newsgroups: demon.ip.support.nt