🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <h2F+WZAJGqQzEwTV@kennedym.demon.co.uk>
           rkm@kennedym.demon.co.uk "Kennedy" writes:

"Having just got used to the old data rates returning after the post
"Christmas fiasco, they have died again.  Is anyone else noticing that
"the cps rate for nows downloads has fallen to the laughable speed of
"300cps on average, compared to a normal 6500cps average?

[snip - including regrettable last para.]

    Not for me it hasn't.  Speeds pretty much the same as ever.  It
 probably really is a case that something you are doing has
 changed, or else something along the way.  (Unless it's to do
 with the Ascend modification - see other groups/threads.)
 Could it be as simple as disk fragmentation?

    As a side-issue, shouldn't anyone who has a problem with
 either reliability or speed of connection try various numbers as
 a matter of course before posting?  This is a ngroup dealing with
 DISPC, which lets you put in a whole string of numbers; I have
 about four alternatives set.

                                        Chris K.
-- 
Chris Kennington (in news-reader mode)
Reply to me as "cjk <at> inf-eden.demon.co.uk", replacing the <at>