Re: Evesham Vale PC's

Article View: demon.tech.pc

Article #68767

#68767

From: John Naismith
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 00:00

15 lines
1278 bytes

In article: <pBlG7$ALhngxEwox@wookie.demon.co.uk>  John Beardmore 
<wookie@wookie.demon.co.uk> writes:

> A triumph of marketing or modular design ?

God knows John. The only reason I can think of is that the existing FAT/VFAT 
drives would have to be re-written & they're afraid of the number of support 
calls that this would generate. Especially when (sorry, if) it went wrong ;-)


-- 
---------------------------
john@naismith.demon.co.uk
---------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <522726220wnr@naismith.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<830014704.7521@stoob.demon.co.uk> <684719628wnr@wilsoni.demon.co.uk> <830082510snz129.os2.7@corixia.demon.co.uk> <653985375wnr@wilsoni.demon.co.uk> <830109620snz129.os2.7@corixia.demon.co.uk> <361034936wnr@wilsoni.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,4118116c6c8b3a53
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: John Naismith <John@naismith.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Evesham Vale PC's
Date: 1996/04/28
Message-ID: <522726220wnr@naismith.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 151867777
x-nntp-posting-host: naismith.demon.co.uk
references: <830014704.7521@stoob.demon.co.uk> <684719628wnr@wilsoni.demon.co.uk> <830082510snz129.os2.7@corixia.demon.co.uk> <653985375wnr@wilsoni.demon.co.uk> <830109620snz129.os2.7@corixia.demon.co.uk> <361034936wnr@wilsoni.demon.co.uk>
x-broken-date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 10:35:24 GMT0BST1
x-mail2news-path: disperse.demon.co.uk!post.demon.co.uk!naismith.demon.co.uk
organization: None
reply-to: John@naismith.demon.co.uk
newsgroups: demon.tech.pc

Reply to Parent Message