Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #68768Disk Performance: ISA Cache vs EIDE on Motherboard
From: Peter Hayward
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 00:00
23 lines
1600 bytes
1600 bytes
I own an ISA caching disk controller fitted with 4MB of 30 pin simms (well what use are 30 pin simms these days?) but I'm thinking of getting a new motherboard and CPU that is likely to have it's own on board (E)IDE controller. The question is:- Would I better off keeping my caching contoller or moving to the on board (E)IDE? My gut feeling is that keeping the cache controller is the better option. I appreciate that the ISA card will have a much lower data transfer rate, say 5 times slower than the on board controller. But the data transfer portion of a block read is modest compared with rotational latencies and even more so with seek times. It's in the last two area's that the cache will show gains, but will that balance out the lower transfer rate? Any comments? -- Peter Hayward, Cambridge, UK. | In a democracy the public will only peter@cdsl.demon.co.uk | respect laws if they respect the tel +44-1223-312-923 | politicians that make them.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<830685352snz@cdsl.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,42f6e50e063305b8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public From: Peter Hayward <peter@cdsl.demon.co.uk> Subject: Disk Performance: ISA Cache vs EIDE on Motherboard Date: 1996/04/28 Message-ID: <830685352snz@cdsl.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 151869412 x-mail2news-path: disperse.demon.co.uk!post.demon.co.uk!cdsl.demon.co.uk x-nntp-posting-host: cdsl.demon.co.uk organization: Cambridge Digital Systems Ltd reply-to: peter@cdsl.demon.co.uk newsgroups: demon.tech.pc