Re: AMD 486DX100 on "old" 486 motherboard

Article View: demon.tech.pc

Article #71476

#71476

From: John Beardmore
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 1995 00:00

19 lines
1040 bytes

In article <817737961snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>
           raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk "Rajesh Varia" writes:

>In article <817651583snz@wookie.demon.co.uk>
>           wookie@wookie.demon.co.uk "John Beardmore" writes:
>
>> 
>> Why AMD ?  Doesn't that also have less L1 cache than intel ?
>> 
>> -- 
>> John Beardmore
>> 
>Its a lot cheaper though.

Maybe, but it would have to be a lot cheaper to justify having half as
much L1 cache I'd have thought.

-- 
John Beardmore

Technical Details

Message-ID: <817923059snz@wookie.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <472106713wnr@drink.demon.co.uk> <817651583snz@wookie.demon.co.uk> <817737961snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,c2b829ad707a83dd
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: John Beardmore <wookie@wookie.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: AMD 486DX100 on "old" 486 motherboard
Date: 1995/12/02
Message-ID: <817923059snz@wookie.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 120706672
x-nntp-posting-host: wookie.demon.co.uk
references: <472106713wnr@drink.demon.co.uk> <817651583snz@wookie.demon.co.uk> <817737961snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>
organization: Myorganisation
reply-to: wookie@wookie.demon.co.uk
newsgroups: demon.tech.pc

Reply to Parent Message