Re: More On Video Capture and its Constraints

Article View: demon.tech.pc

Article #71631

#71631

From: David Longley
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:00

17 lines
1164 bytes

Latest development:

I have just installed a SEAGATE ST32430N (2.1GB Hawk) and have noted that
the HDSPEED.EXE utility supplied by Miro indicates a VERY slow speed 
compared to the Connor 1.2GB EIDE drive. I am using a Future Domain 
SCSI-2 controller and the ID for the HAWK is 0.

Using SNOOPER, the KB transfer rate is about the same as the EIDE, but
there are serious problems when it comes to video capture with the SCSI
drive. Switching to the EIDE shows that it is something to do with the
drive/controller and Windows 3.11. (I defragmeted the Hawk and it made
no difference).

Can anyone shed any light on this?
 
-- 
David Longley

Technical Details

Message-ID: <816637345snz@longley.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <815753545snz@longley.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,e0277735248e4ace
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: David Longley <David@longley.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: More On Video Capture and its Constraints
Date: 1995/11/17
Message-ID: <816637345snz@longley.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 119583958
x-nntp-posting-host: longley.demon.co.uk
references: <815753545snz@longley.demon.co.uk>
organization: Relational Technology
reply-to: David@longley.demon.co.uk
newsgroups: demon.tech.pc

Reply to Parent Message