Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #71807Re: window size
From: John Beardmore
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 1995 00:00
32 lines
1631 bytes
1631 bytes
In article <815793495snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>
raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk "Rajesh Varia" writes:
>If I remember Escom used to supply a cut down version of PC-DOS (IBM)
>called PC-DOS lite.
>
>> I've heard good things about the first two.
>>
>If you are running DOS & Windows, I recommend staying with MS for both
>products. That why if you have a problem then they cannot blame PC-DOS.
True, but I thought there were various advantages to DOS 7. I'd be tempted
to stick with it because it's a better thing !
>> I'd keep Warp too unless you need NT for running some particular app.
>>
>Who mentioned anything about installing NT ?
Nobody. :) It was just a subtle plug for OSs that are not toys. :)
>Personal I'd go for Win95 over Warp after what Warp did to my hard
>drive while trying to install. Luckly I backed up before trying to
>install it.
I've not been too impressed with '95. It seems to have some problems
running DIS216D in a dos box, specifically PCELM, which I've not seen
elsewhere. Other bogeys too; about three of them.
--
John Beardmore
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<815840613snz@wookie.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<47595526@tlc1.demon.co.uk> <815785140snz@wookie.demon.co.uk> <815793495snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,662b0e37d09f083 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public From: John Beardmore <wookie@wookie.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: window size Date: 1995/11/08 Message-ID: <815840613snz@wookie.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 118938552 x-nntp-posting-host: wookie.demon.co.uk references: <47595526@tlc1.demon.co.uk> <815785140snz@wookie.demon.co.uk> <815793495snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk> organization: Myorganisation reply-to: wookie@wookie.demon.co.uk newsgroups: demon.tech.pc