Article View: demon.tech.unix
Article #254Re: Demon Commerce Web Server Perl CGI question
From: Tom Pearson
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:00
11 lines
1074 bytes
1074 bytes
In article <8lai8t$796$2@axalotl.demon.co.uk>, Huge
<huge@nospam.huge.org.uk> writes
>Untrue. Perl 4 to Perl 5 wasn't. In particular, unescaped "@" characters
>in literal strings generate an error in 5 but were accepted in 4.
From the way Richard's article read, I got the impression he was talking
about changes between the various 5.x versions.
I'm sure he'll be along to clarify soon though,
Tom
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<nrU575AW6Ne5Iwik@behemoth.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<uPrIFNG6xIe5EA4Q@turnpike.com> <8lai8t$796$2@axalotl.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac57,d8d9e2526b3e273c X-Google-Attributes: gidfac57,public From: Tom Pearson <Tom@artificer.co.uk> Subject: Re: Demon Commerce Web Server Perl CGI question Date: 2000/07/22 Message-ID: <nrU575AW6Ne5Iwik@behemoth.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 649298698 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: behemoth.demon.co.uk:158.152.61.13 References: <uPrIFNG6xIe5EA4Q@turnpike.com> <8lai8t$796$2@axalotl.demon.co.uk> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 964222734 nnrp-01:25799 NO-IDENT behemoth.demon.co.uk:158.152.61.13 Organization: ^H^H^H^H^H MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: demon.tech.unix