Re: Demon Commerce Web Server Perl CGI question

Article View: demon.tech.unix

Article #255

#255

From: Richard Clayton
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:00

23 lines
1676 bytes

In article <nrU575AW6Ne5Iwik@behemoth.demon.co.uk>, Tom Pearson
<Tom@artificer.co.uk> writes

>In article <8lai8t$796$2@axalotl.demon.co.uk>, Huge
><huge@nospam.huge.org.uk> writes
>>Untrue. Perl 4 to Perl 5 wasn't. In particular, unescaped "@" characters
>>in literal strings generate an error in 5 but were accepted in 4.
>
>From the way Richard's article read, I got the impression he was talking
>about changes between the various 5.x versions.

There are lots and lots of differences between Perl versions. It would
be unusual for most people to come across any of them - especially if
they wrote in a mainstream sort of way.

>I'm sure he'll be along to clarify soon though,

the Perl home site is the place for the detail

-- 
richard                       writing to inform and not as company policy
     want to have an influence on ICANN ?  http://members.icann.org/
"Assembly of Japanese bicycle require great peace of mind" quoted in ZAMM

Technical Details

Message-ID: <zY9$gkBjWOe5EA6p@turnpike.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <uPrIFNG6xIe5EA4Q@turnpike.com> <8lai8t$796$2@axalotl.demon.co.uk> <nrU575AW6Ne5Iwik@behemoth.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac57,d8d9e2526b3e273c
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac57,public
From: Richard Clayton <richard@turnpike.com>
Subject: Re: Demon Commerce Web Server Perl CGI question
Date: 2000/07/22
Message-ID: <zY9$gkBjWOe5EA6p@turnpike.com>
X-Deja-AN: 649308378
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: rnc-portable.turnpike.com:194.70.55.161
References: <uPrIFNG6xIe5EA4Q@turnpike.com> <8lai8t$796$2@axalotl.demon.co.uk> <nrU575AW6Ne5Iwik@behemoth.demon.co.uk>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 964224993 nnrp-07:23048 NO-IDENT rnc-portable.turnpike.com:194.70.55.161
Organization: Turnpike Ltd
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: demon.tech.unix

Reply to Parent Message