Article View: dfw.general
Article #16737Re: Bush RIPuglican Paid to GIVE BJ to Cop
From: Suburbanaristic
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:27
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:27
139 lines
8684 bytes
8684 bytes
In article <gsri93dtua719qii4qs8lf3oi86ctlr486@4ax.com>, "will(from the reality based community)" <willmills@canoemail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:35:49 -0000, Mike <mikeintexas@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >On Jul 14, 2:25 pm, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm> > >wrote: > ><snip> > > > >> Obviously, you're too damned young and ignorant to remember the early 70s. > >> > >> Not only was gasoline rationed, but energy consumption was regulated > >> with great success in controlling the resultant pricing schedule. > > > >I remember that time; I dropped out of college and leased a Gulf > >filling station in my tiny home town. Gas in a nearby larger town > >was from 43-48.9 while I charged what the other two stations in town > >charged for regular: 53.9, a profit margin for me of .16 cents/ > >gallon. That was an unspoken price fix, I suppose, and even while my > >distributor always bitched at me to lower prices (he told me eight > >cents/gallon was plenty enough), I didn't because I knew I couldn't > >compete with those other two guys who had been in business a lot > >longer than me. (and unleaded was introduced during that time, too) > > > >Just a little personal BS and here's some more: I am third generation > >oil field trash and have worked in quite a few different areas of the > >exploration, production and refining of oil and gas. > > > >It annoys me when people speak of price controls and then try to point > >out a time in the past where it worked; I can't think of any time > >they ever worked...perhaps during WWII, but not the time you speak of. > > > >In the early 70's, Nixon placed price controls on the oil industry as > >well as other sectors of the American economy in order to combat > >inflation. Eventually controls were lifted from everything else but > >US-produced oil as so to protect consumers from the jump in world oil > >prices caused by the Arab oil embargo of 73-74. A windfall profits > >tax was imposed in 1980 for the same reason due to the Iran/Iraq > >war. It was finally repealed in 1989 but not before it cost the oil > >companies an estimated 79 billion dollars, money which could've been > >used to invest in new domestic production and exploration leading to > >1.6 billion fewer barrels of oil being produced in the U.S. from > >1980-1988. The tax reduced domestic oil production as much as 6 > >percent, and increased oil imports as much as 16 percent. > > > >You think their profits are too high? They sure might seem > >excessive, esp. when you start talking BILLIONS, some "real" money but > >let's talk percentages of profit, not amounts. At approx. 9%, oil > >company profits are below other industries such as computers, > >chemicals, electrical equipment, beverage / tobacco and > >pharmaceuticals and medicines (in that order, with the last having a > >profit margin of over 20%.) > > > >Kraft Foods profit margin went down a bit this last year, but they > >still managed to rake in 9.4 billion. Why not put a windfall profits > >tax on their 14% profit? > > > >U.S. Energy Information Administration http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/finance/ > >(EIA) > >indicates that when the average price of unleaded regular peaked at > >about $3 a gallon in the middle of 2006, major companies were making a > >profit of about 10 cents a gallon on their U.S. refining and marketing > >operations. > > > >So, that's too much for you and Hillary and Teddy? > > > >I don't have the figures right off hand, but gasoline prices sure have > >gone up quite a bit since the late 80's; 65% was the figure up until > >this last price increase, I believe, but in that same time food has > >gone up 80%, housing 90%, rent 110%, medical care 210% and tuition, > >school fees and childcare have gone up a staggering 325%. > > > >I think the cost of a good premium tequila has gone up 300% since Bush > >was in office, but I don't hold him responsible for the Mexican agave > >crop failure of his first year. Blame him for some of the > >following, but they all have affects upon the price of crude oil: > >Let's not forget the 2005 hurricane season, which shut down most of > >the U.S. Gulf of Mexico's oil and gas production for several months > >and wrecked most of its refining infrastructure. Throw in the war in > >Iraq, unrest in Nigeria, the Iran crisis, the increasing demand from > >China, India and other developing nations and that leads to > >uncertainty over the long-term stability of supply. That's what is > >driving up the price of oil, not the "greedy oil companies". > > > >U.S. oil refining capacity is now less than it was in 1980, and since > >that time there's been a 25 percent increase in demand. Because of > >costly environmental regulations, it's been 30 years since a new > >refinery has been built. According to the American Petroleum > >Institute, over the last 10 years, it has cost the oil industry $47 > >billion to comply with costly and sometimes useless environmental > >controls. There are restrictions on exploiting the huge oil reserves > >in Alaska, the Gulf and the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. > > > >Over the past 25 years, oil companies directly paid or remitted more > >than $2.2 trillion in taxes, after adjusting for inflation, to federal > >and state governments-including excise taxes, royalty payments and > >state and federal corporate income taxes. That amounts to more than > >three times what they earned in profits during the same period, > >according to the latest numbers from the Bureau of Economic Analysis > >and U.S. Department of Energy. These figures do not include local > >property taxes, state sales and severance taxes and on-shore royalty > >payments. > > > > Gullible is no way to go through life, sir. Nice story, but full of > holes and bull. > > You think you're the only one smart enough to price fix gasoline? > > Shell actually tried to close down a refinery and the government made > them sell it instead. See, the oil companies want to maximize profits > and not building new refineries limits supply. I'm sure you can > understand that restricting supply affects prices. And like the guy > that passes gas and blames someone else, it sure is easy to blame the > environmentalists and giggle. > > As for all those taxes paid by big oil... > > http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2006/09/13/AM200609134.html > > http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/14/business/14oil.html?ei=5088&en=87dc413fa6add > 582&ex=1297573200&adxnnl=1&partner=rssnyt > > You can like oil companies all you want, but most of us want to > decrease oil usage rather than act like junkies seeking more and more > of it. Worst of all you actually defend the dealers as victims rather > than as profiteers who are making every cent they can off the stuff, > even if they have to cut corners. Don't blame the oil companies, the system rewards shareholders at the exclusion and exploitation of non-shareholders. Great that the stock market is at all-time highs, but for the non-shareholder, that means most likely a further misery, as most dollars available are hoarded by the wealthy (the rest are sent to mexico.) The system has to be rebuilt. Clinton/Chavez '08.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Musselman-F34C03.20273014072007@news-server.tx.rr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!roadrunner.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<hb7c931fstn7d7vdijb8mjnvesmq62heuo@4ax.com> <besc935riskeg4g5fs6eoe6ee7hmhfgdfm@4ax.com> <4696e2e2$0$16605$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <WjDli.6328$rL1.1836@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net> <1184304271.584349.262990@g37g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <1184350385.109659.234550@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <6J7mi.262$fj5.99@trnddc08> <VZ8mi.10254$rL1.2860@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net> <qq9mi.2278$ct5.1165@trnddc06> <1184459749.807179.56390@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <gsri93dtua719qii4qs8lf3oi86ctlr486@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 104ad1,dc8661088b12dc4e X-Google-Thread: 10619d,b02e5944bc686fae X-Google-Thread: fc730,b02e5944bc686fae X-Google-Attributes: gid104ad1,gid10619d,gidfc730,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!roadrunner.com!not-for-mail From: Suburbanaristic <Musselman@wohoo.com> Newsgroups: dfw.general,alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.sports.football.pro.dallas-cowboys Subject: Re: Bush RIPuglican Paid to GIVE BJ to Cop Organization: Musselman References: <hb7c931fstn7d7vdijb8mjnvesmq62heuo@4ax.com> <besc935riskeg4g5fs6eoe6ee7hmhfgdfm@4ax.com> <4696e2e2$0$16605$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <WjDli.6328$rL1.1836@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net> <1184304271.584349.262990@g37g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <1184350385.109659.234550@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <6J7mi.262$fj5.99@trnddc08> <VZ8mi.10254$rL1.2860@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net> <qq9mi.2278$ct5.1165@trnddc06> <1184459749.807179.56390@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <gsri93dtua719qii4qs8lf3oi86ctlr486@4ax.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 20:27:31 -0500 Message-ID: <Musselman-F34C03.20273014072007@news-server.tx.rr.com> Lines: 139 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com