🚀 go-pugleaf

Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:

> Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:e0afed$i2f$7@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> 
>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:33:52 -0500, SHERMLOCK SHOMES!
>> <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
>> 
>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:45:28 -0500, SHERMLOCK SHOMES!
>>>> <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>the real mh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jack Zwick wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <Xns979351E3C373Fchico@216.196.97.136>,
>>>>>>>  Weatherman@Global.Warming.is.a.Farce.net wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Those *scholarly* climate experts ( a.k.a. dedicated leftists,
>>>>>>>> loonies and solidified kooks ;) just want to *believe* in GW so
>>>>>>>> badly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's called {changing weather patterns}, kooks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Get over it and cool your "globally warmed" heels.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It's one thing to prove Global Warming, its quite something
>>>>>>> different to demonstrate that its caused by human intervention.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Anyone who's studied the Geologic History of the Pleistocene
>>>>>>> knows how great climate swings were (4 times even) long before
>>>>>>> man's ancestors descended from trees.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "Warming" is a misnomer.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Global Climate Change is more accurate.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And the *real* (not creation) science is clear -- the massive
>>>>>> increase in C02 put into the atmosphere by our activity is having
>>>>>> a direct impact on the climate. And the time scale of the recent
>>>>>> changes seem to be much faster than previous "nature-induced"
>>>>>> changes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Whether anything can be done at this late hour to change the
>>>>>> course we're on -- probably not.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But for the life of me, I can't understand why folks can't simply
>>>>>> own up to the fact that yes, indeed, humans are having a direct
>>>>>> impact on our environment.
>>>>>
>>>>>because they are lazy-ass cheapskates who don't care about their own
>>>>>(or anybody else's) health.
>>>> 
>>>> Do you suppose the chemicals used to make your favorite black
>>>> toenail polish contribute to the problem?
>>>
>>>black?  i never use black.  i'm not a fucking goth.
>> 
>> What color do you use?  Purple?
> 
> You don't want to know it's not polish.
> 
>>>...and no.  nail polish doesn't *produce* CO2, you fucking assnard.
>>>you really are this stupid, aren't you?
>> 
>> Typical fucktard Mop Jockey response.  Where did I write that nail
>> polish produces CO2?
>> 
>> The toenail polish fumes have obviously damaged your brain.
> 
> It's more like a death of a thousand cuts. Being born st00pit doesn't
> help in the case of the Mop Jockey.
> 
> Nice to see you've added another pet, need any extra leashes?
> 

oh look, Cujo posted in dfw.general once, so nobody's gonna mind if he's a
poasthumping, net.and.rl.stalking cretin! 

:]

-- 
<insert pied piper song here>
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***