🚀 go-pugleaf

On 09 Sep 2006 12:21:54 GMT, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com>
wrote:

>In our last episode, <na75g2pe0002qbop9pjtp7hnvf4bei5q5h@4ax.com>, the
>lovely and talented Mike Smith broadcast on austin.general:
>
>> On 08 Sep 2006 23:51:16 GMT, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com>
>> wrote:
>
>>>In our last episode, <vdg3g2dl4ncccv8t23m4k4h877d1if2g7h@4ax.com>, the
>>>lovely and talented Len Tropy broadcast on austin.general:
>>>
>>>> On 7 Sep 2006 19:42:23 -0700, "Chris Pando" <chris.pando@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>we live in a secular
>>>>>Republic. 
>>>
>>>> With CHRISTIAN based laws !
>>>
>>>No.  You christofascists have not yet completely extinguished liberty in
>>>America. And guess what -- your god-boy Bush has fucked things up so bad,
>>>that you are not going to get the chance to go much further.  You're going
>>>to lose control of Congress, freedom will prevail, and your dreams of
>>>setting up a christofascist theocracy will go back to dung heap of failed
>>>attempts to crush human rights. 
>
>> So Lars... When your prediction falls, like all the other left wing
>> fantasies, what are ya gonna do? Blame the loss on the voting
>> machines? 
>
>It is a proven fact that Diebold machines are crooked.  Whether
>christofascists are brazen enough to try to steal an election that not so
>close as a handful of points remains to be seen.
>
>What does not remain to be seen is the proven qualities of the human desire
>for liberty.  You cannot extinguish that with crooked electronic voting
>devices.
>
>> Blame the loss on "The Message". Blame the loss on anything
>> but your own philosophy?
>
>It is true that freedom's philosophy does not always win elections.
>But it always will prevail in the long run.
>
>> Blame the loss on the Republican scheme to
>> disenfranchise voters?
>
>> One of those 4 is the normal blame game played by liberals after 1994,
>> 2000, 2002, & 2004. Why should 2006 be any different...
>
>Of course we have had a series of crooked elections.  But there is no
>gainsaying that they were close to begin with.  And yes, you can fool all of
>the people some of the time.  When it isn't close to begin with, election
>fraud will not sit right even with many people who voted for the side that
>cheated.
>
>Why do you hate freedom so much?
Liberal's definition of "Freedom": 
Do what we tell you to do.
Say what we tell you to say.
Believe what we tell you to believe.


{Whoops... forgot the most common excuse...}

You seem to believe:
It's all a right wing conspiracy to deny voters their God-given....
errrrr... human right to be governed by the socialists... errrr
liberals.... errrr Democrats.!!! YEA that's the ticket!!!!

Have you and Larry been hanging out together?


Mike Smith