🚀 go-pugleaf

Mike Smith wrote:
> On 09 Sep 2006 12:21:54 GMT, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> In our last episode, <na75g2pe0002qbop9pjtp7hnvf4bei5q5h@4ax.com>, the
>> lovely and talented Mike Smith broadcast on austin.general:
>>
>>> On 08 Sep 2006 23:51:16 GMT, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> In our last episode, <vdg3g2dl4ncccv8t23m4k4h877d1if2g7h@4ax.com>, the
>>>> lovely and talented Len Tropy broadcast on austin.general:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7 Sep 2006 19:42:23 -0700, "Chris Pando" <chris.pando@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> we live in a secular
>>>>>> Republic. 
>>>>> With CHRISTIAN based laws !
>>>> No.  You christofascists have not yet completely extinguished liberty in
>>>> America. And guess what -- your god-boy Bush has fucked things up so bad,
>>>> that you are not going to get the chance to go much further.  You're going
>>>> to lose control of Congress, freedom will prevail, and your dreams of
>>>> setting up a christofascist theocracy will go back to dung heap of failed
>>>> attempts to crush human rights. 
>>> So Lars... When your prediction falls, like all the other left wing
>>> fantasies, what are ya gonna do? Blame the loss on the voting
>>> machines? 
>> It is a proven fact that Diebold machines are crooked.  Whether
>> christofascists are brazen enough to try to steal an election that not so
>> close as a handful of points remains to be seen.
>>
>> What does not remain to be seen is the proven qualities of the human desire
>> for liberty.  You cannot extinguish that with crooked electronic voting
>> devices.
>>
>>> Blame the loss on "The Message". Blame the loss on anything
>>> but your own philosophy?
>> It is true that freedom's philosophy does not always win elections.
>> But it always will prevail in the long run.
>>
>>> Blame the loss on the Republican scheme to
>>> disenfranchise voters?
>>> One of those 4 is the normal blame game played by liberals after 1994,
>>> 2000, 2002, & 2004. Why should 2006 be any different...
>> Of course we have had a series of crooked elections.  But there is no
>> gainsaying that they were close to begin with.  And yes, you can fool all of
>> the people some of the time.  When it isn't close to begin with, election
>> fraud will not sit right even with many people who voted for the side that
>> cheated.
>>
>> Why do you hate freedom so much?
> Liberal's definition of "Freedom": 
> Do what we tell you to do.
> Say what we tell you to say.
> Believe what we tell you to believe.

That's just what your pastor said you should do last Sunday and all the 
Sundays before that!

Voracious