🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 15:06:05 GMT, Voracious <null@void.org> wrote:

>Mike Smith wrote:
>> On 09 Sep 2006 12:21:54 GMT, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> In our last episode, <na75g2pe0002qbop9pjtp7hnvf4bei5q5h@4ax.com>, the
>>> lovely and talented Mike Smith broadcast on austin.general:
>>>
>>>> On 08 Sep 2006 23:51:16 GMT, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> In our last episode, <vdg3g2dl4ncccv8t23m4k4h877d1if2g7h@4ax.com>, the
>>>>> lovely and talented Len Tropy broadcast on austin.general:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2006 19:42:23 -0700, "Chris Pando" <chris.pando@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> we live in a secular
>>>>>>> Republic. 
>>>>>> With CHRISTIAN based laws !
>>>>> No.  You christofascists have not yet completely extinguished liberty in
>>>>> America. And guess what -- your god-boy Bush has fucked things up so bad,
>>>>> that you are not going to get the chance to go much further.  You're going
>>>>> to lose control of Congress, freedom will prevail, and your dreams of
>>>>> setting up a christofascist theocracy will go back to dung heap of failed
>>>>> attempts to crush human rights. 
>>>> So Lars... When your prediction falls, like all the other left wing
>>>> fantasies, what are ya gonna do? Blame the loss on the voting
>>>> machines? 
>>> It is a proven fact that Diebold machines are crooked.  Whether
>>> christofascists are brazen enough to try to steal an election that not so
>>> close as a handful of points remains to be seen.
>>>
>>> What does not remain to be seen is the proven qualities of the human desire
>>> for liberty.  You cannot extinguish that with crooked electronic voting
>>> devices.
>>>
>>>> Blame the loss on "The Message". Blame the loss on anything
>>>> but your own philosophy?
>>> It is true that freedom's philosophy does not always win elections.
>>> But it always will prevail in the long run.
>>>
>>>> Blame the loss on the Republican scheme to
>>>> disenfranchise voters?
>>>> One of those 4 is the normal blame game played by liberals after 1994,
>>>> 2000, 2002, & 2004. Why should 2006 be any different...
>>> Of course we have had a series of crooked elections.  But there is no
>>> gainsaying that they were close to begin with.  And yes, you can fool all of
>>> the people some of the time.  When it isn't close to begin with, election
>>> fraud will not sit right even with many people who voted for the side that
>>> cheated.
>>>
>>> Why do you hate freedom so much?
>> Liberal's definition of "Freedom": 
>> Do what we tell you to do.
>> Say what we tell you to say.
>> Believe what we tell you to believe.
>
>That's just what your pastor said you should do last Sunday and all the 
>Sundays before that!
>
>Voracious

 I don't have a pastor... Looks like your talking points were in
error, again. However, you do appear to be an adequate parrot.

Mike Smith