🚀 go-pugleaf

On 2007-07-01 09:17:14 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:

> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:48:31 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2007-06-30 08:11:38 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>> 
>>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:51:07 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2007-06-29 20:35:38 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:17:49 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2007-06-28 07:40:36 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:11:33 GMT, CJT <abujlehc@prodigy.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Mike Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:33:44 GMT, leroyblue@pillinor.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 01:27:42 -0500, David Agnew
>>>>>>>>>> <DavidAgnew@nospam.nul> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Posted on Tue, Jun. 26, 2007
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> GOP Senator Says Iraq Plan Not Working
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> ANNE FLAHERTY The Associated Press
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The Senator is up for re-election and is playing politics. THE
>>>>>>>>>> ASSOCITED PRESS! You have got to be kidding. There isn't a more
>>>>>>>>>> anti-American propaganda machine in existence.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Yes there is...
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Reuters.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Mike Smith
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> In other words, in the eyes of Republicans, the truth hurts.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Whatever feeds your fantasies, dude...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Study Claims Iraq's 'Excess' Death Toll Has Reached 655,000
>>>>>> By David Brown?Washington Post Staff Writer?Wednesday, October 11, 2006; A12
>>>>>> A team of American and Iraqi epidemiologists estimates that 655,000 
>>>>>> more people have died in Iraq
>>>>> 
>>>>> Awww poor dumb slim... once again playing in bullshit that's about 2
>>>>> feet taller than he is...
>>>>> 
>>>>> From:
>>>>> http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
>>>>> minimum dead civilians 	66,764
>>>>> Maximum dead civilians	73,07
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From your own source:
>>>> 
>>>> Summary
>>>> On every available indicator the year just ended (March 2006 � March 
>>>> 2007) has been by far the worst year for violence against civilians in 
>>>> Iraq since the invasion:
>>> 
>>> Is this your way of stating that you were 100% wrong on the amount of
>>> civilian deaths in Iraq?
>>> 
>>> OK.
>>>> 
>>>> And yet, you continue to support a war against a country that was no 
>>>> threat to us.
>>>> 
>>> What country would that be, dumbass? Do you even know what "no threat" means?
>> 
>> Iraq.
>> 
>> Bush said Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11/
>> 
>> Remember?
> 
> Thanks for posting more proof that you ARE a fuckin moron.
> In your demented brain, not having anything to do with 9-11 equals no
> threat to our Nation. You are a fool.


No, you blathering moron.

Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 AND IRAQ WAS NO THREAT TO US.

"AND" in the operative word here. Watch some Sesame Street to learn 
what "AND" means.

IRAQ was never a threat to America.

Get you head out of Leroys ass and see that the threat WAS and CONTINUES to be
Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden and his family are SAUDI. 19 of the 21 9/11er's 
were SAUDI.

You let the Saudis have a free pass because BUSH is in bed with them.

-- 
"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in 
England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after 
all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it 
is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a 
democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist 
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to 
the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL 
THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of 
patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY 
COUNTRY."
�
--Goering at the Nuremberg Trials