🚀 go-pugleaf

I am neither pandering to you nor changing my story.  Obviously, I didn't
take part in the phone call so I cannot say with certainty what took place.
 I am trying to get all the facts while assuring you that the situation is
being looked into.

For the third time, when the judging takes place, if there are pages which
are equally qualified, other criteria will be considered as a tie breaker. 
The link didn't become more or less tasteful, your competition changed. 
That's all.

Also  to repeat myself once again, we are a private enterprise, and as such
reserve the right to say what will or won't be permitted to reside on our
property.   And as I've said, your site is in no way in violation of any FN
guideline nor is it illegal.

After the initial post on this topic from your friend, which was so
fantastically unfactual, I attempted to set the record straight and have
continued to reply in a timely and honest fashion to your complaints. 
However, there will be no further responses from me on this subject until
such a time as we have had a chance to fully investigate the matter.

Sincerely,

Susan


-- 

Susan Forbes
FlashNet Communications
Technical Support Manager


jshauser@flash.net wrote in article <881583879.25639@dejanews.com>...
> Susan,
> 
> Please dont pander to me, this is insulting now. You are changing your
> story as this is a public relations disaster for Flashnet. The fact of
> the matter remains that I was told the link was illegal. I wrote two
> emails on Dec 2 and Dec 3 which clearly state my issues. If I did not
> violate Flashnet's terms then why was any statement made to me? If you
> web assistants had comments why didnt they contact me directly? Why is
> the person in Customer Service interested in drugs and porno links on
> Flashnet? Why was the site considered in poor taste and now in
> appropriate taste?
> 
> I do not care about the contest, future contests, or site of the year. I
> am embarrassed and humilitated for all the people on #politics who have
> contributed to this site and the channel. I support the First Amendment
> and our right to discuss and share information whether I agree or
> disagree with it. Once again I find it very curious that in Flashnet's
> TERMS, Flashnet will determine what is illegal? How is this process
> accomplished? What is the criteria? Where is it posted for review? As a
> private business you have every right to determine what is on your
> servers but as a consumer I have rights to know and read your rules so I
> can make an informed decision on purchasing your services.
> 
> I believe there is censorship at Flashnet and consumers beware,
especially
> in view of this incident!
> 
> jshauser
> 
> -------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
>       http://www.dejanews.com/     Search, Read, Post to Usenet
>