🚀 go-pugleaf

"No One" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Eeava.1428$Ly2.191893@cletus.bright.net...
| "Juan Jimenez" <b_d-5_n-o_s-p_a-m@b_d_5.com> wrote in message
| news:au1va.553322$Zo.119640@sccrnsc03...
| > Well, I checked with giganews and this idiot Uncle Samuel (Chrissie?) is
a
| > troll, most likely from under some rock in a Colorado landfill. Into the
| > twit list "it" goes.
| >
| >
|
| http://groups.google.com/groups?&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&th=264d0e36d8cc97fd
| A hallmark of our troller, Uncle "Psycho" Samuel <stars@bars> has been his
| use of multiple posting
| personalities. Who could forget the thousands of loveable and abusive
| postings under the names of
| "Chris", "Tony Clifton", "Patrick Fitzpatrick", "Anonymous", "Capicorn-1",
| "Tranquility"  and many
| others, with dozens of reply addresses such as
| anonymous@anonymous.anonymous, me@here.now,
| my@net.not.yours, running@dog.net, and man@moon.org.
|
| Not to be unreasonably critical as it temporarily serves my purposes to
also
| post under a Nom de
| Plume, our Chrissie "Uncle Samuel" has gone to great lengths to avoid
Google
| archive searches of his
| history by constantly changing posting handles, posting services, and
email
| addresses, using dozens
| of them.
|
| But where is the dividing line between a legitimate interest in privacy
and
| a psychotic abuse of the
| internet?
|
| In early 2002, an individual posting under the name of "Kingfish"
| <nospam@attbi.com>  appeared on
| the local posting scene; "Kingfish" jumped in to local discussion as a
| long-time participant might,
| referencing postings and threads on co.general and boulder.general that
| occurred prior to his
| arrival.
|
| "Kingfish" was mostly an agreeable chap, but for some reason, a majority
of
| his postings were
| replies or comments in agreement with postings by Chrissie AKA "Uncle
| Samuel"  who in those days was
| "Capicorn-1". It's interesting that the newbie "Kingfish" wasn't so green
as
| to eschew the use of
| the anonymizing Randori.com as a posting host from the beginning to this
| very day.
|
| Forward to the present and we note a psychotic need by our "Uncle Samuel"
to
| indignantly or
| abusively respond to any post critical of the war or the Bush regime.
| Lately, that urgent need to
| defend the policies of the president and his own opinions has taken on an
| almost hysterical tone.
| "Uncle Samuel" appears to be losing it.
|
| I couldn't avoid notice that over the last week, "Kingfish" and our "Uncle
| Samuel" have been
| on-line, immediately downloading and replying to each 'other's ' postings,
| within minutes.. Timing
| is everything, we all know.
|
| 3-11 Kingfish @ 9:54, Uncle Samuel replies in agreement @ 10:17.
| 3-11 Kingfish @ 9:42, Uncle Samuel replies at 10:17.
| 3-26 Uncle Samuel @ 8:29, Kingfish adds agreement at 9:44.
| 3-26 Kingfish posts @ 9:41; Uncle Samuel agrees within minutes at 9:52.
| Ad nauseum.
|
| Not unexpectedly, "Kingfish" and "Uncle Samuel" are the only two personas
| that replied to my post of
| 3/26 poking fun at Uncle Sammy on b.g.
|
| A glance at "Kingfish's" recent postings on Google shows that 80% of a
| representative sample are
| replies in agreement to "Uncle Samuel" postings, or vice versa.  No one
| else.
| Wow! The same as the "Kingfish" replies to Capicorn-1's postings at the
| beginning. What an amazing
| coincidence.
|
| It's one thing to be the perpetual anonymous troll, Chrissie, but you
| slipped under pressure. You
| would have to be a psycho to pay for the multiple USENET posting hosts
that
| you have only for the
| purpose of publicly validating your own opinion. And yet you have.
|
| You have demonstrated that you don't have a pito, so you do it publicly on
| USENET instead.
| Observe the truth in the cartoon, get a life and see a shrink.
| *************************************************
| in the same thread:
| I've been thinking recently that it's a bot.  Who would really have the
| time to spend so many hours a day on USENET, and enough pent up anger to
| always come off as a dog barking at the end of its chain?  Plus, the
| posts are incredibly predictable***.  I think it's a Perl script some CU
| grad student wrote for his master's paper on modern Turing machines.
|
|

nice conspiracy theory, but not the case.

I'm conservative, libertarian leaning, and on the computer all the time.
Generally, Sam and I agree because we both have similar political beliefs.
We have disagreed on certain issues - immigration in particular.  Sam seems
to lean towards isolationism while I tend to believe free and open boarders
are an essential element to freedom.  Also, if I cared to do so I could post
from many different email addresses via Randori, but I don't.  There are
also many other recognizable style differences between Sam and I, but hey -
if you want to believe we are one in the same, more power to you lol.  I am
however a long time participant of co.general and found it to be a good idea
to be anonymous.  Maybe I am every anonymous poster on co.general besides
you.  It's all a giant conspiracy, you know or Maybe I'm really the
conservative side of Donald/aozotorp lol.

Think what you like, but sorry: "you missed."  Better luck next time.

The bot theory is perhaps the most intriguing, but that would be a hell of a
perl script......<G>

Kingfish