🚀 go-pugleaf

In article 
<24f096ea-a674-4f7a-a916-7ddb91a6674d@j32g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
 bushlyed <bushlyed@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Nov 29, 11:33�am, 4...@mydaja.com wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:34:31 -0600, Kenny Blankenship
> >
> > <Kenny.Blankens...@PainfulElimination.com> wrote:
> > >Dude, let it go. �Your anger is consuming you.
> >
> > A study showed Conservitives were more happy with life, and Liberals
> > weren't as happy.
> >
> >
> 
> Was that study done before or after November 4th?
> 
> And by the way, wonderful quote from Abraham Lincoln:
> 
> Allow the president to invade a neighboring nation, whenever he shall
> deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him to do so
> whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such a purpose
> - and you allow him to make war at pleasure.

The smart thing to do, a la Clinton, is *don't ask for permission*.

Bush screwed up, fell into a trap. Those clever dems lied for years about 
the "imminent threat", and when Bush fell for it, they happily voted in the 
majority to "allow him to make war at pleasure".

Then at the earliest possible time, thy cleverly decided to take the other 
side, the one they told us was winning handily, while our troops were 
committing atrocities and murdering innocents in cold blood.

"This war is lost"

"Murdering in cold blood"

The previously hawkish democrats borrowed heavily from the language of the 
insurgents, Islamists and the like to attack the president, to try and force 
a surrender.

The democrats stopped just shy of praising Allah, but those who praise Allah 
praised the democrats for their fervent support for their aims, their 
right-thinking ways. Allah akhbar!

Of course, with the New Power and the New Politic - peace is at hand?

Think again. Look at that quote from Lincoln and ask yourself if there's 
*anything* followers would deny this man if the US was provoked.

It would be seen as not only an attack on America, but worse still, an 
attack on Obama.

The dogs of war run wild under democrats, they have no problem with 
violence, especially our emerging progressive fascists.

Their biggest problem these days is figuring out *which side they're on*, 
and they, like tribal islamists, will switch in the middle of a war.

Tribals switch to save their own skin, liberal hawks switch for political 
gain, and they have slavish, unquestioning followers who have convinced 
themselves that history first noticed Saddam around 2002 or so.