🚀 go-pugleaf

Al wrote:
>> In article
>> <24f096ea-a674-4f7a-a916-7ddb91a6674d@j32g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
>> bushlyed <bushlyed@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 29, 11:33 am, 4...@mydaja.com wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:34:31 -0600, Kenny Blankenship
>>>>
>>>> <Kenny.Blankens...@PainfulElimination.com> wrote:
>>>>> Dude, let it go. Your anger is consuming you.
>>>>
>>>> A study showed Conservitives were more happy with life, and
>>>> Liberals weren't as happy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Was that study done before or after November 4th?
>>>
>>> And by the way, wonderful quote from Abraham Lincoln:
>>>
>>> Allow the president to invade a neighboring nation, whenever he
>>> shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him to
>>> do so whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such
>>> a purpose - and you allow him to make war at pleasure.
>>
>> The smart thing to do, a la Clinton, is *don't ask for permission*.
>>
>> Bush screwed up, fell into a trap. Those clever dems lied for years
>> about the "imminent threat", and when Bush fell for it, they happily
>> voted in the majority to "allow him to make war at pleasure".
>>
>> Then at the earliest possible time, thy cleverly decided to take the
>> other side, the one they told us was winning handily, while our
>> troops were committing atrocities and murdering innocents in cold
>> blood.
>>
>> "This war is lost"
>>
>> "Murdering in cold blood"
>>
>> The previously hawkish democrats borrowed heavily from the language
>> of the insurgents, Islamists and the like to attack the president,
>> to try and force a surrender.
>>
>> The democrats stopped just shy of praising Allah, but those who
>> praise Allah praised the democrats for their fervent support for
>> their aims, their right-thinking ways. Allah akhbar!
>>
>> Of course, with the New Power and the New Politic - peace is at hand?
>>
>> Think again. Look at that quote from Lincoln and ask yourself if
>> there's *anything* followers would deny this man if the US was
>> provoked.
>>
>> It would be seen as not only an attack on America, but worse still,
>> an attack on Obama.
>>
>> The dogs of war run wild under democrats, they have no problem with
>> violence, especially our emerging progressive fascists.
>>
>> Their biggest problem these days is figuring out *which side they're
>> on*, and they, like tribal islamists, will switch in the middle of a
>> war.
>>
>> Tribals switch to save their own skin, liberal hawks switch for
>> political gain, and they have slavish, unquestioning followers who
>> have convinced themselves that history first noticed Saddam around
>> 2002 or so.

It doesn't seem to be working out that well for you.