Article View: dfw.singles
Article #219Re: BEING SHORT
From: Jim
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 1996 00:00
28 lines
2823 bytes
2823 bytes
kutschke@fnpspa.fnal.gov (Robert Kutschke) wrote:
>
>There were 18 matches.
>
>Of these, 14 specified a minimum height of 5'7'' or more.
> 1 specified a minimum height of 5'6''
> 3 specified no minimum height
>
>Just for kicks, I released the requirements of non-smoker, no kids and the
>stats became:
>
> 33 specified a minimum height of 5'7'' or more
> 3 specified a minimum height of 5'5'' or 5'6''
> 4 specified no minimum height
Just to complete the picture, could you tell us what the height
distributions were of the women of the varying categories? Were the women
basically saying "my height or taller" or were they requiring the man to
be some minimum number of inches taller. (Another post suggested that men
are 4-5" taller on average). How many of these women would you have been
interested in anyway? I would suggest that if any of them are under 5'4",
you respond anyway and tell them that you are not their ideal height. Or
does the service screen that?
Better yet, take up swing dancing and forget the dating services.
Jim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5806ev$ma9@boursy.news.erols.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <4g8ver$dr1@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3287efbe.4036760@news.mindlink.net> <328E7FC8.73E0@cris.com> <56muon$hna@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com> <56nbcd$3u3@nntp.interaccess.com> <56rulh$56e@ocean.silcom.com> <56t5lv$2c@camel2.mindspring.com> <32928F5F.132B@fox.nstn.ca> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114c98,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid114c98,public X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public From: Jim <jtitus@erols.com> Subject: Re: BEING SHORT Date: 1996/12/03 Message-ID: <5806ev$ma9@boursy.news.erols.com> X-Deja-AN: 202002712 references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <4g8ver$dr1@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3287efbe.4036760@news.mindlink.net> <328E7FC8.73E0@cris.com> <56muon$hna@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com> <56nbcd$3u3@nntp.interaccess.com> <56rulh$56e@ocean.silcom.com> <56t5lv$2c@camel2.mindspring.com> <32928F5F.132B@fox.nstn.ca> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Erol's Internet Services mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,alt.vegas.personals,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.personals,la.personals x-mailer: Mozilla 1.22KIT (Windows; U; 16bit)