🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4a77go$184@access4.digex.net>,
Moo's Access Point <moobox@access4.digex.net> wrote:
>In article <4a6lu4$eqp@access2.digex.net>,
>Chris Smolinski <cps@access2.digex.net> wrote:
>
>>Did anyone from Digex examine the specifications of these slicks, to see 
>>if they were suitable for 28.8 operation? Sounds to me like Digex bought 
>>cheaper voice grade equipment, rather than the required data grade.
>
>Bell Atlantic purchased, installed, and owns the AT&T SLC-96 <or whatever
>they're called> equipment. 
>
>Bell Atlantic is under no (none, zero, nada) obligation to provision 
>voice quality analog phone lines to support 28.8K. If you can find us 
>something in the mass of Public Utility Commission regulations to 
>demonstrate otherwise, we'd love to hear it.
>
>>>We are in the process of updating our literature to reflect this 
>>>and investigating possible options to support higher speeds of 
>>>connectivity.  We'll keep you updated.
>>
>>Updating literature? That's it? How about updating our credit card 
>>accounts for the service not provided?
>
>While I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, DIGEX cannot be responsible 
>for the non-performance of Bell Atlantic owned services and equipment. 

Quite the diversionary marketing spin you put on that...hah!  The question
was did DIGEX ever spec things out....here we go again with the "blame BA
for everything" routine...  I can understand even if no one at Digex
thought to spec things out...but this kind of response just insults
people...