Article View: digex.general
Article #94Re: DIGEX Customer Newsletter
From: Sean Connery
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 1995 00:00
21 lines
1601 bytes
1601 bytes
In article <4a6lu4$eqp@access2.digex.net>, Chris Smolinski <cps@access2.digex.net> wrote: >Did anyone from Digex examine the specifications of these slicks, to see >if they were suitable for 28.8 operation? Sounds to me like Digex bought >cheaper voice grade equipment, rather than the required data grade. I guess not! Not if they're rated at 19.2...it's rather lousy. Digex is stuck in the middle...smaller ISPs have no problem....huge ones don't either...just the slick-willy middlers... If ANYONE knows of an ISP of any size in the DC/MD/VA area supporting v.34+ PLEASE let me know!!! >>Expansion Update >>Next Stop - Boston! > >Do they know what they're in for? Doubt it... What I have learned from the new digex.status group is that DC has the fewst problems of all their sites at least...other sites are constantly listed with major sounding problems....
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4a777d$11v@access4.digex.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4a6a30$2n2@ss2.digex.net> <4a6lu4$eqp@access2.digex.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a9ce,d1501dbbe4ab84f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a9ce,public X-Google-Thread: 15ff9f,d1501dbbe4ab84f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid15ff9f,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,d1501dbbe4ab84f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: 109e7a,d1501dbbe4ab84f7 X-Google-Attributes: gid109e7a,public From: bond@access4.digex.net (Sean Connery) Subject: Re: DIGEX Customer Newsletter Date: 1995/12/07 Message-ID: <4a777d$11v@access4.digex.net> X-Deja-AN: 121355616 references: <4a6a30$2n2@ss2.digex.net> <4a6lu4$eqp@access2.digex.net> organization: Universal Export newsgroups: digex.general,digex.slip,balt.general,dc.general