Article View: dnet.ham
Article #136Re: RFC1226 - Internet Protocol Encapsulation of AX.25 Frames
From: Brian Kantor
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 18:42
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 18:42
19 lines
1446 bytes
1446 bytes
>Why would one want to ""digipeat" across the Internet" when if you already
>have the access, you can connect to the INTERNET directly??
>bill KB3YV
Well, think for a moment: since AX.25 frames contain callsigns, you can
now use non-ham IP networks to transport stuff that is legal to transmit,
since it contains required station identification information that standalone
IP lacked. Presumably you'll use the IP address to verify that the packet
originated at a trusted station that's relaying real ham-originated packets,
and then you can just stuff the embedded AX.25 packet out on the air.
Current USA-only FCC {cr,fl}ap about message verification omitted, of course.
However, the original purpose of this was to allow tunneling of frames
around a local network, say in a campus or metropolitan area.
But mainly it's for hacking and groping. Play with it and see what you get.
- Brian
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33863@ucsd.Edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gatewayReferences:
<33850@ucsd.Edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 12f11c,a6c936a51a0f492a X-Google-Attributes: gid12f11c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-05-14 23:56:45 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gateway From: brian@ucsd.EDU (Brian Kantor) Newsgroups: dnet.ham Subject: Re: RFC1226 - Internet Protocol Encapsulation of AX.25 Frames Message-ID: <33863@ucsd.Edu> Date: 14 May 91 18:42:23 GMT References: <33850@ucsd.Edu> Sender: daemon@infoac.rmi.de Organization: The Avant-Garde of the Now, Ltd. Lines: 19