Article View: dnet.ham
Article #137Re: RFC1226 - Internet Protocol Encapsulation of AX.25 Frames
From: Louis A. Mamakos
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 20:12
Date: Tue, 14 May 1991 20:12
14 lines
1066 bytes
1066 bytes
Brian, Didn't you know it was a sin to invent a new protocol without a version number? Perhaps a 4 (or possibly more) byte header with version number, "header" length and padding would be a worthwhile addition. That would leave you space for options to imbed authentication data so that you could label amateur packet radio originated frames so that they could be put back on the air at a gateway station. Who know what other stuff lies down this path.. louie WA3YMH
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9105141647.AA25494@sayshell.umd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gatewayReferences:
<33863@ucsd.Edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 12f11c,a6c936a51a0f492a X-Google-Attributes: gid12f11c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-05-15 00:15:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gateway From: louie@sayshell.umd.EDU (Louis A. Mamakos) Newsgroups: dnet.ham Subject: Re: RFC1226 - Internet Protocol Encapsulation of AX.25 Frames Message-ID: <9105141647.AA25494@sayshell.umd.edu> Date: 14 May 91 20:12:23 GMT References: <33863@ucsd.Edu> Sender: daemon@infoac.rmi.de Organization: RMI Net INFO.box Systems * Aachen * Hamburg * Flensburg Lines: 14