Article View: dnet.ham
Article #140TCP-Group Digest 240591.1815
From: daily posting
Date: Fri, 24 May 1991 16:24
Date: Fri, 24 May 1991 16:24
27 lines
1746 bytes
1746 bytes
From: Gareth Howell <garethh@cix.compulink.co.uk> Date: Fri, 24 May 91 10:30 GMT Subject: Socket Keep-awake Option? Hi, Maybe my reasons for wanting keep-awake are being mis-understood. I don't want it to disconnect sessions that have gone temporarily awol, in which case, I agree, let it come back later: the situation I am trying to recover from is the other end crashing (or timing out in the case of MSYS). It doesn't require ICMP involvement: all it needs is for the sending end to send a 0 length data frame with ACK set. If it doesn't get through, OK, but if it gets through and the other end has reset the session, it will respond with an RST, which will cause my end to reset as well, thus releasing local resources and restart at the next smtp tick. The question is, whether tcp can be co-erced into sending a 0 length data frame (but I guess this is just like any other ACK). 73 Gareth ---- -- ***************************************************************** ___ ____ ___ _ _ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ _ _ /__/ / / / / /\ / /__ / /__//__// /__//__ /\ / / \ / / __/_ / / /__ / / // //__ / //__ / /
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9105241615.AA10069@infoac.rmi.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gatewayShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 12f11c,e49bfcfa34686a88,start X-Google-Attributes: gid12f11c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-05-24 12:58:59 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gateway From: DIGEST@infoac.rmi.DE (daily posting) Newsgroups: dnet.ham Subject: TCP-Group Digest 240591.1815 Message-ID: <9105241615.AA10069@infoac.rmi.de> Date: 24 May 91 16:24:59 GMT Sender: root@infoac.rmi.de (INFOAC-Operator) Reply-To: dl3no@infoac.rmi.de Organization: RMI Net INFO.box Systems * Aachen * Hamburg * Flensburg Lines: 27