🚀 go-pugleaf

SaPeIsMa wrote:

>>> Too bad that all that shit has nothing to do with the fact that 
>>> following the failure of the Tet Offensive, the North Vietnamese had 
>>> de facto been demolished in their military endeavor
>>> Something that was confirmed in the memoirs of the commander of the 
>>> North Vietnamese forces
>>
>> If anyone could be accused of revisionism, it would be you. The fact 
>> is the the US lost the war in Vietnam. The Viet Cong and NVA lost a 
>> lot of men in the Tet Offensive, but that was in 1968, and the war 
>> went on for several more years. In 1968 the US lost the highest number 
>> of troops in Vietnam, and the second worst year for them was 1969, the 
>> year after Tet when they lost more than they had in the year preceding 
>> Tet. That would seem to contradict your argument that the North had 
>> been militarily demolished.
>>
>>
>>> Which is why the North Vietnamese put all their efforts into the 
>>> Peace talks, and the Lefties and the Dems went along and lost 
>>> diplomatically where the military had succeeded.
>>>
>>
>> They put all their efforts into the peace talks??? The same peace 
>> talks that they would not attend? Nixon launched Operation Linebacker 
>> to force them back to the negotiations.  Nixon, BTW, was a Republican 
>> who campaigned with a promise to get the US out of the war.
>>
>>
>>> As I said, revisionist bullshit has always been the forte of the left
>>
>>
>>
>> LOL you get the facts backwards and accuse others of revisionism.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> keep dancing smithy
> Your literary namesake would be able to learn from you


LOL. I will take that to mean that you realize how silly your comments 
are but aren't smart enough to refute it or man enough to admit that you 
were / are full of crap.