Article View: fido.shortwave
Article #27Re: UPS
From: Jeff
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:55
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:55
37 lines
3040 bytes
3040 bytes
"news.vif.com" <root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com> wrote in message news:1129589847.678620@www.vif.com...
> >>>
> >>>>Not only UPS lost my package, all the gave me was loosely $100 bux
> >>>>for $900 package and fucken BS and squeeze way out not being any
> >>>>insurance on the package.
> >>>
> >>>Lemme see if I follow this.....you shipped something via UPS, you insured the
> >>>package for at least its $900 value. Then UPS lost the package and they will
> >>>only pay you $100 for the loss? Is that what happened?
> >>
> >>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> The way I read it is: he shipped a package "worth" 900.00$ but did
> >>not add any extra ins. UPS lost it and only gave him 100.00$ because
> >>that is the standard amount that comes automatically when you ship
> >>UPS. "IF" that's the case UPS may be the asses that lost it , but the
> >>bigger picture is why didnt he insure it for the "full" amount. UPS's
> >>ins. rates are very reasonable. 2 guilty parties here.
> No. Insurance, giving different story their wasn't
> Bottom of the story i lost out $800 buxs.
> >
> >
> > This is what I suspect also, but I wanted it claified with details from the OP.
> > If this is the case, the OP caused his own loss by not insuring the package,
> > the contract with UPS is plainly stated on many of their forms, their web site
> > and in their store locations. Yeah, UPS screwed up by losing the pkg but
> > the OP harmed himself by not insuring the pkg.
>
> Who fuck side are you on, seems your taking sides (UPS)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither,,,,, just an opinion as to what happened.
J
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<VRW4f.254546$084.141027@attbi_s22>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s22.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<1129565231.833625@www.vif.com> <m9r7l1lh6cfq65hco4lnicd0oevvuianbl@4ax.com> <wRT4f.441234$x96.152942@attbi_s72> <j938l1pb0vqnr024l93hrv2h8m2ch813pu@4ax.com> <1129589847.678620@www.vif.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5341,4e1e0e8924a5995b X-Google-Thread: fd5d6,4e1e0e8924a5995b X-Google-Thread: 1009ad,4e1e0e8924a5995b X-Google-Thread: f507e,4e1e0e8924a5995b X-Google-Attributes: gidf5341,gidfd5d6,gid1009ad,gidf507e,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s22.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeff" <oldog@(nospam)mchsi.com> Newsgroups: fido.shortwave,alt.radio.scanner.uk,aus.radio.scanner,alt.radio.scanner,free.uk.scanner-radio References: <1129565231.833625@www.vif.com> <m9r7l1lh6cfq65hco4lnicd0oevvuianbl@4ax.com> <wRT4f.441234$x96.152942@attbi_s72> <j938l1pb0vqnr024l93hrv2h8m2ch813pu@4ax.com> <1129589847.678620@www.vif.com> Subject: Re: UPS Lines: 39 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-ID: <VRW4f.254546$084.141027@attbi_s22> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.219.27.28 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s22 1129593333 12.219.27.28 (Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:55:33 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:55:33 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:55:33 GMT