🚀 go-pugleaf

"news.vif.com" <root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com> wrote in message 
news:1129589847.678620@www.vif.com...
>
>
> Diamond Dave wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:30:20 GMT, "Jeff" <oldog@(nospam)mchsi.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Diamond Dave" <sjester911@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:m9r7l1lh6cfq65hco4lnicd0oevvuianbl@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:07:11 -0400, "news.vif.com" 
>>>><root@NoReply-AntiSpam.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Not only UPS lost my package, all the gave me was loosely $100 bux
>>>>>for $900 package and fucken BS and squeeze way out not being any
>>>>>insurance on the package.
>>>>
>>>>Lemme see if I follow this.....you shipped something via UPS, you 
>>>>insured the
>>>>package for at least its $900 value. Then UPS lost the package and they 
>>>>will
>>>>only pay you $100 for the loss? Is that what happened?
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>        The way I read it is: he shipped a package "worth" 900.00$ but 
>>> did
>>>not add any extra ins. UPS lost it and only gave him 100.00$ because
>>>that is the standard amount that comes automatically when you ship
>>>UPS.  "IF" that's the case UPS may be the asses that lost it , but the
>>>bigger picture is why didnt he insure it for the "full" amount. UPS's
>>>ins. rates are very reasonable.  2 guilty parties here.
> No. Insurance, giving different story their wasn't
> Bottom of the story i lost out $800 buxs.
>>
>>
>> This is what I suspect also, but I wanted it claified with details from 
>> the OP.
>> If this is the case, the OP caused his own loss by not insuring the 
>> package,
>> the contract with UPS is plainly stated on many of their forms, their web 
>> site
>> and in their store locations. Yeah, UPS screwed up by losing the pkg but
>> the OP harmed himself by not insuring the pkg.
>
> Who fuck side are you on, seems your taking sides (UPS)
> --

You gambled by not insuring and you lost. No sides involved.

Ken