🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <CLAUDE.92Aug26152355@tokyo.trc.mew.mei.co.jp> claude@trc.mew.mei.co.jp (Claude Huss) writes:
    >>
    >>How true.. How true... (Unfortunately.) :-(
    >>
Very true.

I wonder whether this tendency of endless discussion is specific to FJ,
or it is common to other netter groups to a certain extent.

It seems to comes from the nature of computer network.
A book (T. N. Huckin and L. A. Olsen:
Technical Writing and Professional Communication, McGraw-Hill Inc., p. 118)
said, "One (study on electric communication) found
that groups communicating electronically
had more antisocial behavior and made more extreme decisions
than groups communicating in traditional way.
Two others found that responses to an electronic questionnarie were
more extreme, more revealing, and less socially acceptable
than were responses to a paper version of the questionnarie."

I broke out into laughter when I came to this;
for me this statement is funniest one in books on writing.

--
		$@%"%s%j%D!J3t!K8&5f=j!!Bh#38&5fIt(J
			$@0p3@?5B@O:!!(Jinagaki@aclab1.resrch.anritsu.co.jp