🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <ISHIKAWA.92Sep14230936@ds5200.personal-media.co.jp> ishikawa@ds5200.personal-media.co.jp (Chiaki Ishikawa) writes:
 |Correct me if I am wrong, but I think U.S.A. is in the minority in
 |that the country gives a baby born in U.S.A. automatic nationality (or
 |was it citizenship). I believe there are more countries in the world
 |who don't have this practice especially in the Old World (including
 |Japan). It looks to me that U.S.A. and some countries in the New World
 |wanted to have as much as population as possible by giving favorable
 |treatment to babies born even on an airplane flying over the U.S. air
 |space!

So which are you supporting, the New World or the Old World?

I do supoort the New World because the way of doing things in the Old
World irritates me and would probably be against my philosophy.

A few comments:

Being a minority does not necessarily mean being a wrong thing.

What are you going to choose as an alternative if reciprocity on a
relationship between two countries is not respectable anymore?

I am not personally accusing you, but I see some lack of logical
reasoning in your above comment.

// Kenji