🚀 go-pugleaf

"Elisabeth Riba" <lis@osmond-riba.org> wrote in message
news:8vbog3$6ha$1@news.panix.com...
> In ne.general Michael Zarlenga <zarlenga@conan.ids.net> wrote:
> > In ne.general Joseph Teller <fantasyrealms@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > :>Of course, given the latest bit of sleaze from the DNC - a
concentrated,
> > :>active effort to disqualify as many military ballots as humanly
possible -
> > :>this seems like a moot point - at least regarding their right to vote.
>
> > : Did you hear about the reasons for some of those disqualified, such
> > : as:
> > : being mailed several days after the election (according to postmark)
> > : being filed by people that were not registered to vote in the county
> > : they sent it to.
>
> > Those sound like legitimate reasons.
>
> > But there's something you haven't told us ... how many of the
> > ~1000 DQs were for those legitimate reasons?
>
> You do know that the DNC has *no* way of actually disqualifying
> ballots.  They can raise objections to certain ballots, but the actual
> decision on whether a ballot is valid or not is up to each county's
> election board.

You DO know that those local boards are controlled by Democrats in the
counties where recounts are taking place.

You HAVE heard that they're overruling objections raised by Republican
observers, with no avenue for impartial mediation.

Again, no Jesse "Rent-A-Riot" Jackson protesting the soldier's
disenfranchisement.

This whole charade is a disgrace.

Charlie