🚀 go-pugleaf

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- THE HUMAN MAGGOT
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT




In article <lsbrk11s22gtomvpbk7s37a67kg890l9tr@4ax.com>
admin_rbtor <admin^@^rbtor^.^net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:35:58 -0600 (MDT), Borked Pseudo Mailed
> <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <1r5rk1pnef7dhulsefm6r9h900959jtcr8@4ax.com>
> >admin_rbtor <admin^@^rbtor^.^net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> The new service I hope to offer will be more reliable. The darn constant
> >> updates to Windows that requires a reboot or to the firewall security center
> >> requiring a reboot means I might lose mail.
> >
> >I wouldn't worry about that. All sending SMTP servers should retry on a
> >failed connection, so at most the mail would be delayed. Plus, a reboot
> >shouldn't take more than a minute or so anyhow.
>
> True, but I got carried away with the instructions set forth by R Process.
> Unfortunately, or fortunately, depends on how you look at it, I set it up so
> that only I can restart it. I didn't follow all of his suggestions for
> security, (shorter latency)  but most. Everything is heavily password
> protected.
>
> On a reboot, only I can restart it. Problems come in because I use a USB KVM
> switch to switch between the primary computer and the server. When a reboot of
> the server is required, it plays heck with the USB KVN switch. Don't know why,
> but it doesn't want to let me access the server. I have to plug in a spare
> keyboard and mouse and switch the flat panel manually. Do a reboot, shut
> everything down and do a total restart. A real P in the neck.
>
> I have to travel with my work. So I can be out of town for a few days. I set
> all the updates to wait until I return and manually install them. Still, it
> seems to me, if I shut down Mercury for just a few minutes, I lose mail.

The retry swchedules for most SMTP servers lasts for a week!

I never use a keyboard/mouse/screen on my server. Use VNC (over 
an SSH tunnel if you must have the best security).

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Twistycreek re-mailer open to public


On 15 Oct 2005, Admin_rbtor wrote:
twistycreek
>

Good to see your return.

The Mix keyring still needs repair.
A number of remailers are missing capability flags.
i.e. antani, bikikii, frell, metacolo, 

Ciao!

BiKiKii

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Ok, what's not working with Type II?

Hash: SHA1

In article <6v60n1190chqu4ti9fmb7rcrhm0vt3fp6i@4ax.com>
Twisty Admin  <admin^@^twistycreek^.^com> wrote:

> I operate the twisty  re mailer. The results of your testing are very
> valuable to me.
>
> Would you please consider posting these results under [INFO Re mailers] on
> a regular basis?
>
> The tests allow me to diagnosis any problems that may be happening.
>
> Regards, Twisty Admin

Hi, thanks for the service!

Does your Usenet provider carry alt.privacy.anon-server.stats?  That has
been where I've been posting them, because it's the best place in my
opinion.  About once every two weeks.  You can also dredge them up in
google.
If you don't have access to alt.privacy.anon-server.stats I can post them
here if you'd like, but I'd rather not since it might dilute this wonderful
spew of content we have going here. <s>

drsnoid

<<==========>>

Subject: Reasons to avoid Eelbash



  In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
  Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
 
> It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
> remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
> adult remailer system by running Bushwa. 
> 

 
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum.  He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us. 
Yes, those actually were his reasons.

This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.

Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).

So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".

He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.

So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. 
The ones we know about are:


 eelbash
 axloltl
 axolotl2
 cheshire
 congo
 bog
 bogg
 eelbash (again)
 bushwa
 greatwall
 asmodeus
 eelbash (again!)
 eelbash (again!!)
 
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return, 
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading 
people's posts and emails AGAIN.