🚀 go-pugleaf

hyp_slime@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> Under the ORIGINAL Charter set for free.* heirarchy by Palmer,
> There are no rules.
> Now rules are being created in nana.usent without discussion in the proper
> forum - i.e. here,
> Primary concern is that there will be no cancels - but that is a rule.
> Second concern is that there are No rmgroups - but that is a rule.

Indeed. It might be better served to make rules, and set up these tenets 
within the rules.

> A revised Charter was presented by one Tim Skirvin, but he neglected to honor
> the original creation, intent and charters of free.*
> In good Usenet tradition this is not correct - there should be discussion
> here.

Usenet tradition should not apply here, but I agree that discussion should
happen here.

What are the original charters of free.*? 
-- 
Dave Hayes - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org 
  >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<<
Freedom Knight of Usenet - http://www.jetcafe.org/~dave/usenet 

   People who think they know all are often insufferable.
                      Rather like those who imagine that they know nothing.