Fraud By Divination-No Uncertainties Allowed

Thread View: free.control

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by Frank Sat, 02 Dec 2000 00:00

Author: Frank
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 00:00

35 lines
2182 bytes

An excerpt:

When Everyone Else Agrees There's No Reasonable Certainty, Gunzburger
Still Calls It For Gore

JUDGE LEE: Moving on to 21A, there is only one dispute. It's No. 4. I
believe no reasonable certainty.

JUDGE ROSENBERG: No reasonable certainty.

COMMISSIONER GUNZBURGER: Well, it's pushed on Gore, but I don't think
I'm going to have the votes on that, but I'm going to say it is a Gore
vote, based on the rest of the ballot. (Broward County Canvassing Board,
Esquire Deposition Services, November 23, 2000, p. 1405)
END


Reference: Broward County Canvassing Board, deposition by Esquire
Deposition Services
http://www.drudgereport.com/bro.htm


The court ordered voter intent to be determined by reasonable
discretion.

The key word is "reasonable."

However, what had transpired was not reasonable, but rather, it was
fraud, corruption, and ballot tampering.


A more accurate reading of the ballots could be done by anyone certified
by the American Tarrot Card Association, any good astrologer, entrails
reader or tea leaf reader. But the Demos are indeed trying their best,
their "best" being synonymous with fraud.

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads