🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ga.general
Article #105

Re: Sad Day for Liberty

#105
From: William Herrin
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 17:12
45 lines
2794 bytes
In article <1992Nov11.192039.8208@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> oaa@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (owen.a.alexander) writes:
>Anyway, let me stop here, before I start to get angry.  Am I
>anti-homosexual? Yes!  Would I disciminate against or harrass them? No.
>I still stand firm that I don't think that specific laws addressing a
>single group is necessary in this case, but general laws should be
>sufficient.

   A general law works, until. Until a legislature (typically local) passes
a specific law to the contrary or until a court creates a specific exclusion.
Then its necessary to establish a specific law at a higher level to achieve
the same thing the general law was trying to do.

  Or to put it another way, states need to pass "gay protection" laws in order
to counteract anti-gay laws at local and county levels where the religious
right has a stronger hold.


>As a side issue; some people complain how Christians are trying to push
>their morality on others.  I think the gay agenda is a clear case of
>homosexuals trying to push their (im-)morality on others.
>The hypocracy of it is amazing to me.

   Two notes on this:
1) Most people don't complain about "Christians" pushing their morality on
others... They complain about "The Religious Right" (i.e. deeply religious
far-right wing conservatives) trying to push their morality on others.
People like Pat Robertson and Pat Buchanan.

2) There's a significant difference between the "gay agenda" and the
"religious right agenda". The RR's imposition says, "Gay is not right,
therefore YOU will not do it and YOU will not think it is right." The gays
imposition says, "Gay is none of your busniness therefore whether you
personally like it or not, you will not stop me from doing it nor hinder me
because I do it." The RR is telling the gays that they have no right to be
gay, while the gays are telling the RR that only the individual gay has the
authority to decide that.

  Am I being clear on my second point? If not, I'll be happy to elaborate.


-- 
William Herrin                         Internet: gt5254a@prism.gatech.edu
      Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp: ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt5254a
Disclaimer: I speak only for me. (Occasionally only to hear myself talk.)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <74580@hydra.gatech.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!news.ans.net!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!pirates!gatech!prism!gt5254a
References: <568.2AFDFF11@gisatl.fidonet.org> <1992Nov11.192039.8208@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!news.ans.net!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!pirates!gatech!prism!gt5254a
From: gt5254a@prism.gatech.EDU (William Herrin)
Newsgroups: ga.general
Subject: Re: Sad Day for Liberty
Message-ID: <74580@hydra.gatech.EDU>
Date: 12 Nov 92 17:12:38 GMT
References: <568.2AFDFF11@gisatl.fidonet.org> <1992Nov11.192039.8208@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
Distribution: ga
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
Lines: 45