🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ga.general
Article #106

Re: Sad Day for Liberty

#106
From: Richard Pitts
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 18:08
50 lines
2954 bytes
In article <74580@hydra.gatech.EDU> gt5254a@prism.gatech.EDU (William Herrin) writes:
>2) There's a significant difference between the "gay agenda" and the
>"religious right agenda". The RR's imposition says, "Gay is not right,
>therefore YOU will not do it and YOU will not think it is right." The gays

The Christian (Biblical) position is that homosexuality is not right,
but neither are murder, robbery, theft, and adultery.  The position
taken by these latest referendums call for the position to be understood
that we (which is more than just Christians or RR Christians) don't
want to be told that homosexuality is going to be pushed in our face.
To my knowledge the move is not to keep a homosexual from THINKING it is 
right, but to say at a government level that homosexuality is not to be
supported or promoted as A OK.  (That is if one wants to do it, then
don't ask me, my government, or my money to support it.  There is plenty
of art that is wrongly supported by the National Endowment for the Arts 
department with my tax dollars that both attack my religious beliefs and 
my morals.)

>imposition says, "Gay is none of your busniness therefore whether you
>personally like it or not, you will not stop me from doing it nor hinder me

If it is pushed upon my beliefs and I can't reject it, you are wrong.
Christian for-profit radio stations in California cannot deny a job
to one because one is homosexual nor can they fire one who is an activist
for their position even while on the job.

>because I do it." The RR is telling the gays that they have no right to be
>gay, while the gays are telling the RR that only the individual gay has the
>authority to decide that.

The referendums, to my knowledge, haven't taken away one's right to be gay.
They target the governments support of the lifestyle.  

>  Am I being clear on my second point? If not, I'll be happy to elaborate.

Same.

>William Herrin                         Internet: gt5254a@prism.gatech.edu
>      Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
>uucp: ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt5254a
>Disclaimer: I speak only for me. (Occasionally only to hear myself talk.)

Sincerely,
Richard Pitts

-- 
rpitts@cerl.gatech.edu       |    
Atlanta, GA                --|-- 
                        -|-  |  -|-
                         |   |   |
Technical Details
Message-ID: <74585@hydra.gatech.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!news.ans.net!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!udel!gvls1!emory!gatech!prism!emperor!rpitts
References: <568.2AFDFF11@gisatl.fidonet.org> <1992Nov11.192039.8208@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> <74580@hydra.gatech.EDU>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!news.ans.net!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!udel!gvls1!emory!gatech!prism!emperor!rpitts
From: rpitts@emperor.gatech.edu (Richard Pitts)
Newsgroups: ga.general
Subject: Re: Sad Day for Liberty
Message-ID: <74585@hydra.gatech.EDU>
Date: 12 Nov 92 18:08:22 GMT
References: <568.2AFDFF11@gisatl.fidonet.org> <1992Nov11.192039.8208@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> <74580@hydra.gatech.EDU>
Sender: news@prism.gatech.EDU
Distribution: ga
Organization: CERL-EE, Georgia Institute of Technology
Lines: 50