Re: bug or feature with 'type' command ?

Article View: gnu.bash.bug

Article #222

#222

From: Chet Ramey
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 04:43

19 lines
977 bytes

> Hi!
> 
> What should the 'type' command display ?
> When I do 'type -all man' I get
> man is aliased to `bman'
> man is ./man
>        ^^^^^
> This is a directory and shouldn't be displayed according to the 
> documentation of 'type'.

This has already been fixed for the next version of bash.

Chet

--
``The use of history as therapy means the corruption of history as history.''
	-- Arthur Schlesinger

Chet Ramey, Case Western Reserve University	Internet: chet@po.CWRU.Edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9207241243.AA02182.SM@odin.INS.CWRU.Edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!odin.ins.cwru.edu!chet

References: chet@odin.ins.cwru.edu (Chet Ramey)

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!odin.ins.cwru.edu!chet
From: chet@odin.ins.cwru.edu (Chet Ramey)
Subject: Re: bug or feature with 'type' command ?
Message-ID: <9207241243.AA02182.SM@odin.INS.CWRU.Edu>
Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
Reply-To: chet@po.cwru.edu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
References: chet@odin.ins.cwru.edu (Chet Ramey)
Distribution: gnu
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 04:43:38 GMT
Approved: bug-bash@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message