Article View: gnu.bash.bug
Article #772Re: background jobs in 1.04
From: Bill Trost
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1989 00:52
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1989 00:52
16 lines
1087 bytes
1087 bytes
Roy Bixler <roy@sts.com> writes: "... I don't see any reason why a builtin command shouldn't do this. The C shell will even notify you of job completion after you've typed a carriage return. "Also, the C shell has a variable called 'notify', which when set, will asynchronously notify you that your background job is finished. How about if Bash had this too?" Seconded. Waiting for jobs to complete has been rather bizarre in bash, especially since the most natural way to see if a job is done is by typing "jobs", and the command doesn't give correct information. It would seem that the best place to see if jobs have been completed would be right before the potential execution of the PROMPT_COMMAND. -- --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13611@reed.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ctrsol!emory!ogccse!reed!trostReferences:
<278200004@sts>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ctrsol!emory!ogccse!reed!trost From: trost@reed.bitnet (Bill Trost) Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: Re: background jobs in 1.04 Message-ID: <13611@reed.UUCP> Date: 23 Nov 89 00:52:39 GMT References: <278200004@sts> Sender: news@reed.UUCP Lines: 16