Article View: gnu.emacs.vm.bug
Article #8975Re: Macintosh QuickMail
From: Joe Wells
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1992 22:23
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1992 22:23
20 lines
1547 bytes
1547 bytes
In article <9207081715.AA14884@wendy-fate.UU.NET> kyle@wendy-fate.uu.net (Kyle Jones) writes:
Brendan Kehoe writes:
> The above named Mac mailer has the interesting quality of using `Re-'
> instead of `Re:' in its replies.
This is another good reason not to use subject prefixes at all on
replies. If you and your correspodent don't agree on the prefix,
the subject header will get longer and longer as the replies go
back and forth.
No, this is a reason for a more flexible mechanism for handling subjects.
I have sent you code for this several times, and you have (as far as I
know) refused to consider it each time. Most of us value the "Re:" prefix
because it allows us to easily know when a new thread is being introduced.
--
Joe Wells <jbw@cs.bu.edu>
Member of the League for Programming Freedom --- send e-mail for details
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JBW.92Jul11172314@bigbird.bu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!bu.edu!nntp-read!jbwReferences:
<199207081659.AA24544@betty.cs.widener.edu> <9207081715.AA14884@wendy-fate.UU.NET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6829,5a70c7b9966d5f68 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6829,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-07-11 01:08:12 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!bu.edu!nntp-read!jbw From: jbw@bigbird.bu.edu (Joe Wells) Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.vm.bug Subject: Re: Macintosh QuickMail Message-ID: <JBW.92Jul11172314@bigbird.bu.edu> Date: 11 Jul 92 22:23:14 GMT References: <199207081659.AA24544@betty.cs.widener.edu> <9207081715.AA14884@wendy-fate.UU.NET> Sender: news@bu.edu Organization: Boston University Computer Science Department Lines: 20 In-reply-to: kyle@wendy-fate.uu.net's message of 8 Jul 92 17:15:34 GMT