Article View: gnu.emacs.vm.bug
Article #9695Re: i don't want those headers in my reply
From: Kyle Jones
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1991 02:44
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1991 02:44
11 lines
1201 bytes
1201 bytes
piet@cs.ruu.nl (Piet van Oostrum) writes: > Couldn't this be a good candidate for a hook (after compiling the forwarded > message). I know that Kyle prefers variables to hooks because they are > easier to use, but as he doesn't like fiddling with the forwarded message, > that would suggest adding a hook to vm-forward-message. As opposed to my subjective feelings about quite a number of VM options, I think that it is objectively wrong to strip headers from forwarded messages. Putting in a hook instead of a feature is bad enough. Putting in a hook instead of bad feature is even worse. You're on your own with this one, folks.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<125940@uunet.UU.NET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!kyleReferences:
<9103132324.AA09919@wendy-fate.UU.NET> <1991Mar14.143116.18696@cs.ruu.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6829,28dedc046eee16fc X-Google-Attributes: gidf6829,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-03-18 07:38:34 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!kyle From: kyle@uunet.UU.NET (Kyle Jones) Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.vm.bug Subject: Re: i don't want those headers in my reply Message-ID: <125940@uunet.UU.NET> Date: 18 Mar 91 02:44:45 GMT References: <9103132324.AA09919@wendy-fate.UU.NET> <1991Mar14.143116.18696@cs.ruu.nl> Organization: UUNET Communications Services, Falls Church, VA Lines: 11