🚀 go-pugleaf

Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM writes:
 > reality:
 > C-c RET         vm-next-command-uses-marks
 > 
 > Help buffer's fib:
 >    M - use marks; the next vm command will affect only marked messages
 >        if it makes sense for the command to do so

Fixed in 5.27.  This has been wrong for ages but I didn't fix it
because I thought the mark command bindings were rotten anyway.
The new bindings may not be any more mnemonic, but they do have
the saving grace of being easier to type.

 > Also, doing ^H m in the summary buffer should give me a nice list
 > rather than refering me to ^H m in the INBOX.

It should, but I haven't figured out how to do it without
duplicating the doc string.

 > Also I get the funny feeling that not all my messages to the mailing
 > lists get through, and some get thru twice.  I think I'll forget about
 > the mailing list.  Also, the "att" and "uunet" connection is flakey.

The duplicates seem to be caused by a strange interaction between
the From headers of some of your messages and B news' rnews.  I
haven't noticed any messages disappearing.  There has been some
noticable propagation delay on a few messages from AT&T.  I
received a reader comment about your recent `point-to-register'
posting a whole day before the posting itself arrived here and
was gatewayed.