Article View: gnu.epoch.misc
Article #248Re: Ownership of files modified by emacs
From: Brad Miller
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 16:09
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 16:09
25 lines
1730 bytes
1730 bytes
>>>>> On 2 Sep 92 15:12:16 GMT, kelley@kelley.nist.gov (Mike Kelley) said: > Followup-To: gnu.epoch.misc > My question is - How do I teach Epoch (or emacs) to preserve the > ownership of files when they are edited and resaved? Currently, if I > modify a file owned by userxxx and resave it, it is then owned by > me. I think (unless someone can point out why not) I would prefer > that the original ownership be preserved. On a somewhat related note, I am using epoch 4.2 on an SGI runing IRIX 4.0.1. When I save a file, such as a shell script, it is no longer executable. Is there something I can configure to fix this, or is this a bug?? Brad -- Brad Miller | e-mail: bradm@ems.cdc.com | Empros Systems International | v-mail: (612) 553-4886 | 2300 Berkshire Lane N. |Disclaimer: "I see no reason to contradict | Plymouth, MN 55441 | myself at all" George H.W. Bush | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BRADM.92Sep2160916@anchor.anchor.ems.cdc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!ukma!cs.widener.edu!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!uc.msc.edu!shamash!ems!lore.ems.cdc.com!bradmReferences:
<5323@dove.nist.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!ukma!cs.widener.edu!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!uc.msc.edu!shamash!ems!lore.ems.cdc.com!bradm From: bradm@anchor.anchor.ems.cdc.com (Brad Miller) Newsgroups: gnu.epoch.misc Subject: Re: Ownership of files modified by emacs Message-ID: <BRADM.92Sep2160916@anchor.anchor.ems.cdc.com> Date: 2 Sep 92 16:09:16 GMT References: <5323@dove.nist.gov> Sender: sys@ems.ems.cdc.com Followup-To: gnu.epoch.misc Distribution: usa Organization: Empros Systems International Lines: 25 Nntp-Posting-Host: anchor.ems.cdc.com In-reply-to: kelley@kelley.nist.gov's message of 2 Sep 92 15:12:16 GMT