Article View: gnu.epoch.misc
Article #318Re: epoch and lucid
From: Frame By Frame
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 22:16
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 22:16
25 lines
1473 bytes
1473 bytes
> Time between garbage collections is user-customizable. E.g.: > > (setq gc-cons-threshold 300000) Yes, this makes epoch do fewer garbage collections, thanks. However, when it does eventually need to garbage collect, I'd guess it would have more work to do and take longer? I noticed that in lucid, my gc-cons-threshold is the default 100000, and I don't need to raise this value for things to fly.. > Faster at doing what? Redisplay? My own experience is that it's > usually considerably slower (although I haven't tried it on a Sparc). [I've just done a quick comparison on a Sparc 2 with 32 Mb memory] Lucid seems to instantly paint new screen-fulls of text when scrolling, whereas epoch seems to lag a little. The garbage collection was the main problem I had. What do I lose by setting gc-cons-threshold high? - why isn't the default a million? Will epoch support highlighting the current region in a similar way to lucid? Thanks, --- John.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9210122216.AA01664@saxon.Eng.Sun.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!convex!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!eng.SUn.COM!John.CooperReferences:
<9210122307.AA03212@wintermute.ncsa.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.epoch.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!convex!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!eng.SUn.COM!John.Cooper From: John.Cooper@eng.SUn.COM (Frame By Frame) Subject: Re: epoch and lucid Message-ID: <9210122216.AA01664@saxon.Eng.Sun.COM> Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet References: <9210122307.AA03212@wintermute.ncsa.uiuc.edu> Distribution: gnu Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 22:16:15 GMT Lines: 25