Article View: gnu.epoch.misc
Article #320Re: epoch and lucid
From: Marc Andreessen
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 10:29
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 10:29
34 lines
1609 bytes
1609 bytes
"Frame By Frame" writes: > Yes, this makes epoch do fewer garbage collections, thanks. > However, when it does eventually need to garbage collect, I'd guess it > would have more work to do and take longer? Yup, but on a fast processor I doubt you'll notice. (I don't, on a MIPS R3000 33mhz.) > I noticed that in lucid, my gc-cons-threshold is the default 100000, and > I don't need to raise this value for things to fly.. I can't explain, I can't explain, *da dum*, *da dum*... as I said, for me, Epoch is quite a bit faster overall. Ah well, the mysteries of life. > The garbage collection was the main problem I had. What do I lose by > setting gc-cons-threshold high? - why isn't the default a million? My own theory is it's a holdover from PDP-11 days, when 100K bytes was Real Memory. Beats me, otherwise... > Will epoch support highlighting the current region in a similar way to > lucid? I doubt it, unless someone supplies some beautiful, stable, reliable code in handy-to-use 'diff -c' format... Marc -- Marc Andreessen Epoch Development Team University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign marca@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9210130029.AA03390@wintermute.ncsa.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!convex!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ncsa.uiuc.edu!marcaReferences:
<9210122216.AA01664@saxon.Eng.Sun.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.epoch.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!convex!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ncsa.uiuc.edu!marca From: marca@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Marc Andreessen) Subject: Re: epoch and lucid Message-ID: <9210130029.AA03390@wintermute.ncsa.uiuc.edu> Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet References: <9210122216.AA01664@saxon.Eng.Sun.COM> Distribution: gnu Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 10:29:34 GMT Lines: 35