🚀 go-pugleaf

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Levinson <markl@llnl.gov> writes:

    Mark> Hello all, I have been using epoch for quite a while now. I
    Mark> have aliased epoch to use the -nm (nominibuffer) option. I
    Mark> would like to set an X resource so I no longer need this
    Mark> option in the command line. Someone told me what it was once
    Mark> but I forgot what it was. Does anyone know what the resource
    Mark> is and what it should be set to?

    Mark> (M-x Thanks in advance)

From EPOCH-FAQ...

C-1: How do I get the minibuffer back at the bottom of my edit window?
  
  Start Epoch with the command-line option '-nm'.  Alternately, in your
  general .Xdefaults file, specify:
  
    epoch.nonlocal.minibuf: False
  
  (These techniques only work in Epoch 4.0.)




--
				John Connolly, EDS
				jconno03@cps.plnin.gmeds.com

>In article <JCONNO03.94Jan11190408@Earth.cps.plnin.gmeds.com> jconno03@cps.plnin.gmeds.com (John Connolly) writes:
>
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Levinson <markl@llnl.gov> writes:
>
>     Mark> Hello all, I have been using epoch for quite a while now. I
>     Mark> have aliased epoch to use the -nm (nominibuffer) option. I
>     Mark> would like to set an X resource so I no longer need this
>     Mark> option in the command line. Someone told me what it was once
>     Mark> but I forgot what it was. Does anyone know what the resource
>     Mark> is and what it should be set to?
>
>     Mark> (M-x Thanks in advance)
>
> From EPOCH-FAQ...
>
	[...]

>   epoch.nonlocal.minibuf: False
>
>   (These techniques only work in Epoch 4.0.)

	Say, does anyone know how the ``lemacs''/epoch integration
	is going... Has anyone worked on getting nonlocal mini-buffers
	in ``lemacs''?? Are people still using epoch, or are the three
	of us the only ones?

							thanks,
							Darrell Schiebel
							dschieb@nrao.edu

"ds" == Darrell Schiebel <dschieb@muse.cv.nrao.edu> writes:

ds> Say, does anyone know how the ``lemacs''/epoch integration is
ds> going... Has anyone worked on getting nonlocal mini-buffers in
ds> ``lemacs''?? Are people still using epoch, or are the three of us
ds> the only ones?

  I'm still using epoch; mainly because I haven't had time to get the
menu-redrawing bug out of my compile of lemacs-19.8 nor the time to
attempt an FSF emacs-19 compile. I require a terminal-based version of
emacs and using Epoch ensures I don't have to worry too much about the
differences between (l)emacs 18 & 19 packages for when I use an
X-based and a terminal-based emacs. Unfortunately, it has also
prevented me from doing much in the way of upgrading to the "newer,
brighter, lemon-scented" versions of the packages I use (e.g., gnus).

--
michael

In article <WALRUS.94Jan12115741@enchanter.ifs.umich.edu> walrus@umich.edu (Michael Shiplett) writes:
>
>  "ds" == Darrell Schiebel <dschieb@muse.cv.nrao.edu> writes:
>
>  ds> Say, does anyone know how the ``lemacs''/epoch integration is
>  ds> going... Has anyone worked on getting nonlocal mini-buffers in
>  ds> ``lemacs''?? Are people still using epoch, or are the three of us
>  ds> the only ones?
>
>    I'm still using epoch; mainly because I haven't had time to get the
>  menu-redrawing bug out of my compile of lemacs-19.8 nor the time to
>  attempt an FSF emacs-19 compile. I require a terminal-based version of
>  emacs and using Epoch ensures I don't have to worry too much about the
>  differences between (l)emacs 18 & 19 packages for when I use an
>  X-based and a terminal-based emacs. Unfortunately, it has also
>  prevented me from doing much in the way of upgrading to the "newer,
>  brighter, lemon-scented" versions of the packages I use (e.g., gnus).

	I've continued using it because of my attachment to the
	non-local mini-buffer in epoch. I've found it very useful,
	and I wish it were available in lemacs. Emacs19 allows
	non-local mini-buffers, but I don't think lemacs does.
	However, given the new features in lemacs, perhaps it's
	time to throw in the towel (or hack it into lemacs,
	I believe the stubs may be there).

						Darrell Schiebel

In article <WALRUS.94Jan12115741@enchanter.ifs.umich.edu> michael.shiplett@umich.edu writes:
>  I'm still using epoch; mainly because I haven't had time to get the
>menu-redrawing bug out of my compile of lemacs-19.8 nor the time to
>attempt an FSF emacs-19 compile.

Lucid GNU Emacs 19.9 is available now.  Look for it in the usual places
 (ftp.uu.net is one of them;  I don't know the path name since I'm a
  uucp customer and the ls-lR.Z on the uucp host doesn't seem to be
  available right now).
-- 
Todd Masco                    | "I repeat myself when I'm under stress.  I
cactus@clinton.com,  DoD #269 |  repeat myself when I'm under stress.  I re-
SysAdmin, Clinton Group, Inc. |  peat myself when I'm under stress.  I repe.."