gcc 2.3.3's handling of setjmp like functions

Article View: gnu.gcc.bug

Article #1639

#1639

From: Richard Stallman
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 02:11

8 lines
942 bytes

    However, considering the number of machines to which gcc has been
    ported and the likelihood of missing some functions, shouldn't there be a
    way to declare that a function is `setjmp-like'?  Possibly via a pragma
    so that it could be put into the appropriate header files?

It might be reasonable to have a way of doing this, but I don't
like the idea of using pragma for it.  (Or for anything.)
Any other ideas?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9301220819.AA21461@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms

References: <9301192328.AA17335@thokk.think.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms
From: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
Subject: gcc 2.3.3's handling of setjmp like functions
Date: 22 Jan 1993 21:11:25 -0500
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 9
Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu
Approved: bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu
Distribution: gnu
Message-ID: <9301220819.AA21461@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
References: <9301192328.AA17335@thokk.think.com>

Reply to Parent Message