🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #97

Is there a known bug in gcc 2.1 with -O?

#97
From: Richard M. Stallman
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:33
15 lines
1104 bytes
Users should know better that to ask whether there are known
bugs in beta test programs such as GCC version 2.  Of course
there are--lots of them.  If you don't want to use a program
with bugs, don't use version 2.

GCC will continue to have lots of bugs until they are fixed.  We
maintainers can't fix them unless *you* do your part: you have to send
a proper bug report as described in the GCC manual chapter on bugs.

In other words, your job is to *tell us* what is wrong.  (The job is
yours because no one else can do it if you don't.)  If you ask
questions instead of telling us what we need to know, you aren't
helping us fix problems, and they may not *be* fixed.

Remember, a better GCC depends on you!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9204101133.AA06069@jekyll.ccv>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!ccv.FR!rms

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!ccv.FR!rms
From: rms@ccv.FR (Richard M. Stallman)
Subject: Is there a known bug in gcc 2.1 with -O?
Message-ID: <9204101133.AA06069@jekyll.ccv>
Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu
Reply-To: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:33:40 GMT
Lines: 17