Article View: gnu.gdb.bug
Article #624not quite a bug, but ...
From: W. Wilson Ho
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 1988 21:55
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 1988 21:55
15 lines
1039 bytes
1039 bytes
In gdb version 2.7, there are two places that call "malloc" directly
instead of calling "xmalloc". In most cases this is ok, but to make
it perfect, I think it is a better idea to call xmalloc.
The two places are in file "stuff.c" line 116 and line 126.
Wilson Ho
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W. Wilson Ho | INTERNET: how@iris.ucdavis.edu
Division of Computer Science | UUCP: {lll-crg, ucbvax}!ucdavis!iris!how
EECS Department |
University of California | Phone: (916)752-7109
Davis, CA 95616 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8811292155.AA29323@iris.ucdavis.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!IRIS.UCDAVIS.EDU!howShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!IRIS.UCDAVIS.EDU!how From: how@IRIS.UCDAVIS.EDU (W. Wilson Ho) Newsgroups: gnu.gdb.bug Subject: not quite a bug, but ... Message-ID: <8811292155.AA29323@iris.ucdavis.edu> Date: 29 Nov 88 21:55:05 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 15